141st APHA Annual Meeting

In This section

276821
Sexual and reproductive health quality improvement system (SRQIS)

Monday, November 4, 2013

Yvonne Hamby, MPH , Health Services, JSI Research & Training Institute, Denver, CO
Mary Mccrimmon
Background: Within the health care reform environment, quality improvement is considered a means of reducing health care costs by improving efficiencies, as well as health outcomes. Increasingly, sexual and reproductive health programs are making quality of care a top priority. Programs and providers are finding more and better ways to satisfy clients' needs and raise the quality of services while using resources more efficiently.

Project Description: With an emphasis on client-oriented services, the core focus of SRQIS is building capacity to assess and improve quality of care. Performance measurement and quality improvement data are collected via three audit instruments designed to measure specific quality indicators related to service delivery. Its innovation lies in the system's ability to address both Quality Improvement (process indicators and outcomes) and Quality Assurance (documentation of non-outcome chart information).

Findings: The quality of care indicators of the framework are interrelated. Their quality is often determined by common environmental factors such as program policies, operations management, and resource limitations. They represent points of intervention: services can be expanded and updated, and staffs' counseling skills can be improved. However, when all the elements of the system are working well, impacts, such as clients making informed decisions and engaging in safer sexual behaviors, can be achieved.

Conclusions: The SRQIS reflects the principles of Continuous Quality Improvement in which the tools, sampling, and data collection methods are adapted and improved to better assist clinics in assessing their performance.

Implications for Programs, Policy, and Research: SRQIS allows clinics to: measure quality improvement; monitor and document achievements; evaluate program effectiveness and impact; track progress toward an established goal; and use objective data to support program implementation and policy development.

Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Systems thinking models (conceptual and theoretical models), applications related to public health

Learning Objectives:
Describe the implementation of an evidence-based quality improvement system in family planning clinics in PHS Region VIII, and how the system can be adapted to any sexual and reproductive health clinical setting.

Keywords: Assessments, Quality Improvement

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: JSI, Denver, Colorado Project Director, 1999 to present Ms. Hamby’s areas of expertise are program evaluation, research, and quality improvement of health services delivery for underserved populations. She is skilled in quantitative and qualitative research and evaluation design, analysis, and implementation. Her areas of interest are addressing issues of justice and equality through the lens of health.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.