141st APHA Annual Meeting

In This section

278954
What does the Massachusetts experience tell us about the potential impact of the affordable care act on the use of clinical preventive services?

Monday, November 4, 2013

Catherine A. Okoro, PhD, MS , Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Satvinder Dhingra, MPH , Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Ralph Coates, PhD , Public Health Surveillance and Informatics Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Matthew M. Zack, MD, MPH , NCCDPHP, Division of Adult and Community Health, State Support, Arthritis, Epilepsy, and Quality of Life Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Eduardo Simoes, MD, MSc, DLSHTM, MPH , Department of Health Management and Informatics, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO
Background: Expansion of health insurance coverage for clinical preventive services provides an opportunity for improvements in the health of adults. There is limited research on how much expansion of health insurance coverage may affect clinical preventive service use.

Objective: To examine potential effects of the 2006 health reform in Massachusetts on clinical preventive service use.

Methods: We used data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to examine change in healthcare access and use of clinical preventive services among working-aged adults pre-reform (2002-2005) and post-reform (2007-2010) in Massachusetts compared with change in other New England states. Results: In Massachusetts, the proportions of adults who had health insurance coverage, a healthcare provider, no cost barrier to healthcare, an annual routine checkup, and a colorectal cancer screening increased significantly more than those in the other New England states. Massachusetts did not show the significant decline in cervical cancer screening observed in the other New England states. Cholesterol screening, adult influenza immunizations, and mammography screening did not improve more in Massachusetts than in other New England states.

Conclusions: The Affordable Care Act may increase healthcare access and improve use of clinical preventive services. However, the effects of the Affordable Care Act on clinical preventive service use may vary by the type of service and by state.

Learning Areas:
Chronic disease management and prevention
Provision of health care to the public
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines

Learning Objectives:
Assess the potential impact of the Affordable Care Act on healthcare access and assess the potential impact of the Affordable Care Act on use of clinical preventive services recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Keywords: Health Insurance, Clinical Prevention Services

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to be an abstract Author on the content I am responsible for because I am the principal investigator of the study, I led the analysis, writing, editing, and presentation of the work this abstract represents.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.