141st APHA Annual Meeting

In This section

283170
Front-of-package nutrition labels: Useful . . . and forgettable

Monday, November 4, 2013 : 10:30 AM - 10:50 AM

Dan Graham, PhD , Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
Megan Mueller, MPH , Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Melanie Jaeb, RD MPH , Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Lisa Harnack, Dr.P.H., R.D., M.P.H. , Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Introduction: It is unclear whether characteristics of Front-of-Package (FOP) nutrition labels are related to label recall and healthfulness of product selection. Methods: While wearing eye-tracking glasses to monitor visual attention, 64 Minnesotan parent/child pairs selected foods to take home from a laboratory-turned-grocery aisle. Pairs were randomly assigned to view products containing: 1) Multiple Traffic Light labels, which used numbers and colors to indicate quantity of saturated fat, sodium, and sugar; 2) monochromatic Nutrition Keys labels containing only the numeric information; or 3) no FOP labels. Within product category (e.g., cereals) levels of key nutrients-to-limit (e.g., sugar) was compared for chosen foods across condition using t-tests. Parents completed a survey indicating whether they had seen any labels while selecting products. ANOVA compared label recall by condition. Results: There was a significant overall condition effect on recall accuracy (p<.001): 74% of participants in the no-label condition correctly recalled not seeing FOP labels; <46% of participants who saw one of the two FOP label types correctly recalled seeing labels; only 17% of these correctly identified which label had appeared on their products. Participants randomly assigned to view either label selected cereals with significantly lower levels of sugar compared with no-label participants. This pattern was also evident for sodium in chips and fat in cookies. Discussion: FOP labeling appears to improve the healthfulness of food selections; however, current FOP label appearance may not be very memorable to consumers. Implications for future use of labels will be discussed.

Learning Areas:
Administer health education strategies, interventions and programs
Communication and informatics
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Public health or related public policy

Learning Objectives:
Compare various types of front-of-package nutrition labels Explain how eye-tracking can be used in nutrition labeling research

Keywords: Public Health Education and Health Promotion, Food and Nutrition

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been the principal investigator on research funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Minnesota Obesity Center, and The University of Minnesota's Obesity Prevention Center focusing on eye-tracking and nutrition information use. I have published multiple papers in this area in peer-reviewed journals.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.