141st APHA Annual Meeting

In This section

284296
Determinants of responders in a dose-response trial of spinal manipulation for the care of chronic low back pain

Monday, November 4, 2013 : 2:50 PM - 3:00 PM

Darcy Vavrek, ND, MS , Center for Outcomes Studies, University of Western States, Portland, OR
Mitchell Haas, DC, MA , Center for Outcomes Studies, University of Western States, Portland, OR
David Peterson, DC , Center for Outcomes Studies, University of Western States, Portland, OR
Moni Blazej Neradilek, MS , Mountain-Whisper-Light Statistics, Seattle, WA
Nayak Polissar, PhD , Mountain-Whisper-Light Statistics, Seattle, WA
Background: The aim of this secondary analysis is to identify determinants of success of spinal manipulation (SMT) for the treatment of chronic low back pain (cLBP). Methods: We randomized 400 patients with cLBP to receive 18 sessions of lumbar SMT or a light massage control scheduled over 6-weeks; with SMT at 0, 6, 12, or 18 of the visits. Patients were followed for 52-weeks. Successful response to treatment is defined as a 50%-improvement in pain-score measured with a modified Von-Korff (MVK) 100-point pain-scale. Determinants of successful response are baseline measures of pain, disability, outside care, health status, age, gender, relative confidence in SMT/massage, any previous SMT/massage care, and time-point. Three-quarters of the data are randomly allocated into a data-set used to develop the predictive models. Models built by stepwise logistic regression are validated on the remaining data. Sensitivity and specificity for the predictive model will be reported. Results: Preliminary results of univariate models of the entire data-set show that 50%-improvement in the MVK pain-scale was predicted best by lower number of comorbidities followed by more baseline pain, younger age, more baseline disability, and better health status; with an increased count of the number of comorbidities preventing recovery at an OR per 1 comorbidity of 0.84 95% CI[0.72,0.97; p=0.02]. Prediction models developed using 75% of the data and their predictive performance on the remaining data will be presented. Conclusions: Findings from this analysis will assist with developing models for predicting which patients would especially benefit from SMT for their cLBP.

Learning Areas:
Biostatistics, economics
Chronic disease management and prevention
Clinical medicine applied in public health
Other professions or practice related to public health
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
Discuss determinants of response to treatment in a dose-response trial of spinal manipulation for the care of chronic low back pain. Explain the process of building and testing a prediction model. Explain sensitivity, specificity, and AUC.

Keywords: Chiropractic, Chronic Illness

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to be an abstract author on the content because I was a co-investigator on the grant and I am primary author on the paper that will be written based on this presentation.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.