291650
“goodlife. live It well.”: Best practice for scaling up health communication for national level impact across multiple health topics in Ghana
Tuesday, November 5, 2013
: 11:10 AM - 11:30 AM
Ian Tweedie, MPH
,
Center for Communication Programs, Johns Hopkins University, Accra, Ghana
Martha Osei, MA
,
Center for Communication Programs, Johns Hopkins University, Accra, Ghana
Hamid Yakub, MA
,
Center for Communication Programs, Johns Hopkins University, Accra, Ghana
Edward Woods, MPH
,
Center for Communication Programs, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Arzum Ciloglu, PhD
,
Center for Communication Programs, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Background: Vertical interventions often lead to competing messages and duplication of efforts. While integrated approaches risk diffuse messaging resulting in a lack of behavioral impact and intensity on any one issue. “GoodLife. Live it Well.” is an innovative initiative that balances these approaches to achieve intensity, integration and impact. Activities: The “GoodLife” initiative has been implemented from 2010 to present. “GoodLife” unifies multiple health promotion interventions in the areas of family planning, maternal and child health, malaria, nutrition, childhood diarrhea using multiple channels including interpersonal, community and mass media. Methods: Independent data sources were used to evaluate the intervention to date, including: survey data (2008 GDHS, 2011 MICS, 2012 Omnibus), and health service statistics. Results: Evidence suggests that “GoodLife” has made significant contributions to improving population health indicators across multiple health topics. Modern contraceptive use has increased from 17% to 23% from 2008 to 2011. In 2012, women exposed to GoodLife were significantly more likely to use FP than those not exposed (38% vs 25%). Sales of zinc tablets increased by 280% after the campaign as compared to before (8.1 million vs. 2.9 million tablets). Over 60% of women exposed to the malaria campaign were more likely to own an LLIN than those not exposed (48%). Regional blood donation increased by 53% after the campaign as compared to before from 9141 to 13,972 pints. Implications: The innovative strategy of the “GoodLife” initiative achieves a synergy between the strengths of the vertical and integrated approaches resulting in population impact.
Learning Areas:
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Program planning
Social and behavioral sciences
Learning Objectives:
Describe an evidence-based strategy for blending the strengths of vertical and integrated social and behavior change approaches to achieve national level impact across multiple health topics. Explain how innovation and creativity are centrally important in conveying health messages that lead to behavioral impact.
Keywords: International Health, Health Communications
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I've been a Social and Behavior Change Project Director and program implementer for the past 20 years in multiple countries throughout Africa. I'm currently the Project Director of a large project in Ghana.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.