Session

Evolving marijuana policy and implications for alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use

Ann G. Mahony, MPH, Strategic Public Health Consultant, Kensington, MD

2015 APHA Annual Meeting & Expo (Oct. 31 - Nov. 4, 2015)

Abstract

Medical Marijuana Laws, Marijuana Use, and Annual Opioid Analgesic Sales in the United States

June H. Kim, M.H.S.1, Julian Santaella2, Magdalena Cerda, PhD1, Christine Mauro, PhD3 and Silvia S. Martins, MD, PhD4
(1)Columbia University, New York, NY, (2)722 W 168th St, New York, NY, (3)Columbia University, NEW YORK, NY, (4)Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD

2015 APHA Annual Meeting & Expo (Oct. 31 - Nov. 4, 2015)

Aim: To date, 23 states have enacted some type of medical marijuana legislation (MML), and more states may soon pass similar laws. It has been hypothesized that MML may reduce opioid overdose deaths. This study assesses whether state MMLs are associated with opiate consumption and whether this association is mediated by state prevalence of past-month marijuana use.  Methods: Annual opioid sales for 2003-2013 were culled from the Automation of Reports and Consolidated Orders System (ARCOS). This data includes annual sales of seven major opiates (e.g., oxycodone) by state. Morphine equivalent doses (MED) per 100,000 residents were calculated for each state-year observation. Mixed models with a random effect for state and a fixed effect for year were used to estimate differences in the (natural log) average MED rate for states with either effective MML, to be implemented MML, or without MML. Results: We found that the prevalence of past-month marijuana use mediated the association between MML and opiate consumption, and that this association was moderated by MML status. For example, for states that have never implemented an MML, a one percent increase in the prevalence of past-month use was associated with a 4.1% increase in opioid consumption (β= 0.041, p-value=0.059). However, for states that passed future laws or states with a current MML in effect, the association between past-month marijuana use and opiate consumption was near or significantly different (β= -0.039, p-value=0.196, β= -0.053, p-value=0.038, respectively) than the association observed for states that had never passed MML. Conclusions: While the prevalence of marijuana use in states that have never passed MML is associated with increased opioid consumption, this did not hold for states that have passed MML. By increasing availability and thus the prevalence of marijuana use, MML may reduce opioid consumption at the state level.

Epidemiology Public health or related public policy

Abstract

Medical marijuana laws, alcohol consumption, and cigarette use in the US adult population

Yuna Kim, MPA
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

2015 APHA Annual Meeting & Expo (Oct. 31 - Nov. 4, 2015)

Background:

Medical marijuana laws (MMLs) provide legal protection from state-level criminal penalties for patients qualified to use medical marijuana. Very few studies, however, have examined the potential impact of these laws on cigarette consumption, and evidence is mixed on how MMLs impact alcohol use.  This study identifies the effect of medical marijuana legalization on cigarette smoking, and also tests the mediating role of alcohol in this relationship.

Method:

Drawing upon individual-level data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys from 1994-2010 (N=1,655,578), this study employs a difference-in-difference estimation strategy to estimate the effect of implementing MMLs at the state level on the probability of individual cigarette smoking while controlling for alcohol use.  This approach exploits changes in smoking trends within states over time and controls for fixed unobserved state-level characteristics. Estimates are also generated for males and females, different age groups, and various race/ethnicity groups.

Results:

Approximately 24% of the sample reported being current smokers.  Preliminary estimates suggest that MMLs lead to a significant increase in the probability of cigarette smoking by 1.4 percentage points.  Similarly, individuals aged 30-39 experience a statistically significant increase in the probability of cigarette smoking by 1.7 percentage points.  The initial estimates also point to potential differences by race/ethnicity.

Conclusions:

Given that cigarette smoking accounts for nearly 1 in 5 deaths and is the leading cause of preventable disease in the U.S., this paper illustrates the importance of understanding the unintended consequences of medical marijuana laws on tobacco use.

Public health or related public policy

Abstract

Promoting Health through New Marijuana Policies: Impact of Mass Reach Media to Educate Coloradans on Safe, Legal and Responsible Marijuana Use

Alison Maffey, MSW
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, CO

2015 APHA Annual Meeting & Expo (Oct. 31 - Nov. 4, 2015)

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) is funded through marijuana sales taxes to educate Colorado residents about safe, legal and responsible use of retail marijuana by implementing public awareness campaigns on the marijuana laws, and prevention campaigns on the health effects and considerations for high risk populations. CDPHE created a web-portal linking to information from each state agency. CDPHE also worked to integrate messaging across state and local agencies using the guidance from SAMHSA on effective community marijuana prevention strategies in order to positively impact marijuana knowledge, perceptions of risk and behaviors among Colorado residents.

CDPHE contracted with an evaluator to implement a three-year evaluation plan to assess the effectiveness of CDPHE’s retail marijuana education campaigns to:

  • Increase knowledge of the retail marijuana laws and the health impacts of marijuana use, using the literature reviews from the Retail Marijuana Public Health Advisory Committee.
  • Increase perceptions of risk for marijuana use while pregnant/breastfeeding, underage use, over-consumption, or secondhand marijuana smoke exposure.
  • Increase self-reported prevention behaviors, specifically among marijuana users, parents and health care providers:
  • Link the campaign awareness to changes in the above knowledge, perceptions and behaviors.

Baseline assessments were completed prior to the campaign launch in January, 2015. Follow-up assessment will occur June, 2015. All data from the baseline and follow-up assessments will be analyzed and reported to the Colorado General Assembly on November 1, 2015, in time to present the final data analysis on campaign effectiveness at this conference.

Communication and informatics Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs Public health or related education Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines Public health or related public policy

Abstract

New Frontiers for Health in Marijuana Policy: Lessons Learned from Alcohol and Tobacco to Inform Marijuana Policy at the State and Local Level

Alison Maffey, MSW1 and Heath Harmon, MPH2
(1)Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, CO, (2)Boulder County Public Health, Boulder, CO

2015 APHA Annual Meeting & Expo (Oct. 31 - Nov. 4, 2015)

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) completed a policy analysis of effective strategies to reduce youth access, use or exposure to legal substances such as alcohol and tobacco. Colorado implemented similar policies for retail recreational marijuana at the state level through sweeping legislative changes that did not receive media attention for the public health and youth prevention potential of each policy change. Local governments requested model policy language for county and municipal regulations. CDPHE worked with Boulder County Public Health to identify local policy adaptations and recommendations.

To better inform local government officials and outline potential areas for regulatory improvement, CDPHE outlined the categories of state policy changes that incorporated lessons learned from alcohol and tobacco, including increases to unit price, smoke-free policies, strict licensing and regulations, restricting hours of sale, limiting density, set-backs, advertising restrictions and more. Boulder County Public Health, a local public health agency, partnered with CDPHE to describe how each of these state level laws or regulations could be strengthened at the local level to further prevent youth access to the substance.

CDPHE and Boulder County Public Health will share lessons learned from the adaptation of effective tobacco and alcohol policy strategies to retail marijuana and the implementation of those laws and regulations at the state and local level. CDPHE and local public health agencies will continue to monitor the implementation of effective policy strategies applied to retail marijuana in Colorado.

Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines Public health or related public policy