Online Program

319267
Sexual-Orientation Differences in Positive Youth Development


Sunday, November 1, 2015

Robert Coulter, MPH, PhD(c), Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Amy Herrick, PhD, Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh
Ron Stall, PhD, Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA
Background: Positive youth development (PYD) is important for the health of adolescents. Yet PYD can be hindered by victimization, which is disproportionately experienced by sexual-minority youth (SMY). Notably, sexual-orientation differences in PYD remain unexamined. Methods: We used data from 1587 girls and boys (ages 13-18 years) from Wave 6 of the 4-H Study of PYD, a study of U.S. youth sampled from schools and after-school programs. PYD was measured using the validated Five Cs model—Competence, Confidence, Connection, Character, and Caring (Bowers et al., 2010). Each of the Five Cs ranged from 0-100, with higher values representing greater PYD. Sexual orientation was measured via sexual attraction: 7.1% reported having same- or both-gender sexual attractions (henceforth, SMY). Participants reported frequency of bullying victimization in the past couple months (range: 0 [never] to 4 [several times a week]). Multivariable linear regression models were used to assess the effect of bullying on sexual-orientation differences in PYD, controlling for age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Results: Compared to heterosexuals, SMY reported lower scores in Competence (beta=-4.30; p<0.01), Character (beta=-3.44; p=0.02), Connection (beta=-5.29; p<0.001), and Confidence (beta=-6.38; p<0.001). Meanwhile, SMY reported more bullying victimization than heterosexuals (beta=0.33; p<0.001). Upon adding victimization into the multivariable models of PYD, sexual-orientation differences were attenuated by 32.1% for Competence, 19.2% for Connection, and 26.0% for Confidence, suggesting that bullying victimization partly explained these sexual-orientation disparities. Conclusions: SMY have lower PYD than heterosexuals, which may be partially due to bullying victimization. Importantly, our findings can be used to inform healthy development interventions.

Learning Areas:

Diversity and culture
Public health or related research
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
Assess differences in positive youth development by sexual orientation Describe the effect of bullying on sexual-orientation differences in positive youth development

Keyword(s): Adolescents, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT)

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I conducted analyses, interpreted results, and wrote the abstract. I am a doctoral candidate in public health at the University of Pittsburgh.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.