Online Program

321422
Do local health departments engage in population-based mental illness prevention activities?


Wednesday, November 4, 2015 : 12:50 p.m. - 1:10 p.m.

Jonathan Purtle, DrPH, MPH, MSc, Department of Health Management & Policy, Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA
Ann C. Klassen, PhD, Department of Community Health and Prevention, Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA
Jennifer Kolker, MPH, Health Management & Policy, Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA
Background/Purpose:  Preventing mental illness (MI) is widely acknowledged as a public health priority. Little is known, however, about the extent to which local health departments (LHDs) engage in activities to prevent mental illness. The purpose of this study was to estimate the past-year prevalence and correlates of LHDs that engaged in mental illness prevention activities.

Methods:  Data: nationally representative, weighted sample of 505 LHDs that completed Module 2 of the 2013 National Profile of Local Health Departments Study survey (response rate 82%). Dependent variable: past-year provision/contracting of population-based MI prevention activities. Independent variables: Local Health Department population size, geographic region, workforce characteristics, performance of eight other mental health activities.Analysis: Descriptive statistics, multivariate logistic regression

Findings: Only 16.2% of Local Health Departments, serving 24.4% of the U.S. population, reported engaging in population-based MI prevention activities. LHDs were significantly (p< .05) more likely to engage in population-based MI prevention activities if located in the west (31.1%), had a population size 100,000-499,999 (27.0%), 1-5 behavioral health providers per 100,000 population (35.1%), or provided/contracted substance abuse services (53.6%). After adjusting for covariates, LHDs that engaged in population-based MI prevention activities were significantly more likely to provide/contract mental health services (AOR: 7.21, 95% CI: 4.30, 12.10) and engage in mental health policy advocacy activities (AOR: 3.23, 95% CI: 2.02, 5.17).

Implications: That vast majority of Local Health Departmentss in the U.S. do not engage in population-based MI prevention activities. Future research is needed to understand how structural factors and inter-organizational relationships with other government/non-government agencies influence LHDs’ MI prevention activities.

Learning Areas:

Public health administration or related administration
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines

Learning Objectives:
Describe proportion of local health departments in the US that engage population-based in mental illness prevention activities Discuss factors that are associated with local health departments engaging population-based in mental illness prevention activities

Keyword(s): Mental Health, Public Health Administration

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am the PI on a RWJF-funded research project exploring the role of local health departments in addressing population mental health. I have a DrPH, MPH and am Assistant Professor at an accredited school of public health.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.