Online Program

327312
Psychological Distress Associated With Cancer Screening in Adults: A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials and Observational Studies


Monday, November 2, 2015

Sarah Coleman, MPH, Benson-Henry Institute of Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
Roberta Goldman, B.S., Benson-Henry Institute of Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
Lara Traeger, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
Elyse Park, PhD, MPH, Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
Hannah Gartner, B.S., Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME
William Pirl, MD, MPH, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
Emma Chad-Friedman, B.A., Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
Background/Purpose: Research has shown that undergoing cancer screening may cause distress. Currently, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force cancer-screening guidelines are written in consideration of potential stress during cancer screening. However there is limited research and there has not been a comprehensive systematic examinination of levels of distress within or across different types of cancer screenings. The purpose of this review is to examine to what extent distress is a potential barrier to adherence to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations on cancer screenings.

Methods: A systematic review of English articles was done through academic search engines Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to present) and PsychINFO. The review considered the levels of psychological distress in different types of screening from randomized controlled trials and observational studies in the United States among individuals over 18. Only studies with distress measured two weeks before or within one month after cancer screening were included. As of present, 140 studies have been extracted and are being summarized following a systematic scheme.

Findings: 5,167 articles were initially found using the databases. Using a systematic coding scheme of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 2,652 studies were removed based on title and 2,143 were removed based on abstract. Currently 140 articles are under final review to determine their eligibility for data extraction.

Implications: Identifying levels of distress across various cancer screening procedures and tumors can inform policy around cancer screening recommendations.

Learning Areas:

Chronic disease management and prevention
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines
Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
Identify levels of distress within and across different types of cancer screenings. Discuss to what extent distress is a potential barrier to adherence to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations on cancer screenings.

Keyword(s): Cancer Prevention and Screening, Stress

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am receiving my MPH from Boston University School of Public Health and completing my practicum for the program at Massachusetts General Hospital. I am interested in mental health and cancer screening, and have worked on this systematic review as part of a team.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.