328865
Creating and implementing a community-engaged evaluation framework to understand and promote health equity
Methods: The HECEPP framework includes four components: community engagement (its central component); communication planning (communication processes for multi-partner information sharing); cultural competency evaluation readiness of the project team; and health equity evaluation planning. Photo elicitation sessions, key informant interviews, and a stakeholder power analysis and mapping session provided a triangulated, qualitative approach to assess community and stakeholder perceptions of health equity.
Results: Community and stakeholder participants perceived community fit (community-defined quality, safety, values, and norms) and access (convenience, cost, safety, and awareness of products/services) as key factors in promoting health equity through the CTG strategies. Findings were presented at a town hall meeting and a county Board of Health. The HECEPP framework and findings are used as a guide for a newly formed health equity workgroup at North Carolina's department of public health.
Conclusions: With an emerging, national focus on equity, multi-sector partnerships, community engagement, and healthcare and community linkages, the HECEPP framework is a useful evaluation approach for establishing trust between collaborating partners, leading to in-depth understanding of, and results that promote, health equity.
Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practiceDiversity and culture
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Learning Objectives:
List the four core components of the Health Equity Collaborative Evaluation Planning and Implementation Project (HECEPP) framework.
Differentiate between three qualitative data collection procedures: photo elicitation, key informant interviews, and stakeholder power analysis and mapping.
Describe how community engagement can be used to develop an evaluation framework.
Keyword(s): Community Health Programs, Evaluation
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been the principal or co-principal of multiple federally funded grants focusing on community-based participatory research and/or community engaged research, and evaluation in ethnically diverse populations. Among my scientific interests has been the development of evaluation measures for improved community engaged research on chronic disease outcomes, with emphasis on community-academic partnerships.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.