Online Program

330276
Relationship between drug-use and a drug-testing policy in a military population


Monday, November 2, 2015 : 1:10 p.m. - 1:30 p.m.

Lauren Grattan, PhD Computational Neuroscience: Neuroeconomics and Addiction, Public Health Assessment Program, Health Promotion and Wellness, U.S. Army Public Health Command and Army Institute of Public Health, Oak Ridge Associated Universities/Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Engineering (ORISE), APG-EA, MD
Background: The U.S Department of Defense requires the military to carry out drug testing on Soldiers. The intent of the program is to deter Soldiers from illicit drug use. The details of the policy are developed and executed by different branches of the military. There is currently no published data on the relationship between the drug testing policy in the Army and drug use by Soldiers.

Methods: The study sought to identify the correlation between implementation of drug-testing policy and the incidence of drug-positives within multiple cohorts (e.g. Army units). Using a Poisson regression model, we examined the association between  incidences of drug positives within each cohort and the incidences of drug testing for each cohort, predictability of each cohort’s testing schedule, total number of Soldiers within each cohort, and the type of testing (ie. random, commander’s directed etc.) conducted by each cohort while controlling for demographics.

Results: In a sample size of 459,962 drug tests among 3827 cohorts over the first three months of 2014, we observe that overall implementation of Army drug-testing policy does not correlate with incidences of drug positives. Rather, as the unpredictability of random testing increases the number of incidences of drug positives increase (β=0.9086, p<0.0001) and as the total number of random tests increase the incidences of drug positive increase (β=0.378, p<0.0001).

Conclusions: These results suggest that strict implementation of Army policy leads to increased detection of drug-use; however, further studies are needed to determine the efficacy of drug-testing as a deterrent for drug-use.

Learning Areas:

Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Occupational health and safety
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines
Public health or related public policy

Learning Objectives:
Evaluate the impact of implementation of U.S. Army drug-testing policy on incidence of drug-positives in the Army.

Keyword(s): Drug Abuse, Surveillance

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified because I evaluate health promotion programs targeting high risk health behaviors, including drug misuse and abuse. I also serve as a program evaluator and consultant for programs addressing various high risk health behaviors such as sexual assault/harassment, suicide, and substance use in military populations. In addition, I am a member of various working groups focused on high risk behaviors, brain health, and substance use.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.