Online Program

330692
Who counts and how: Retrospective analysis of point-in-time homeless counts in the United States


Monday, November 2, 2015

Jemma Alarcón, UC Irvine School of Medicine, Program in Medical Education for the Latino Community (PRIME-LC), University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA
Brandon Brown, MPH, PhD, Department of Population Health and Disease Prevention, Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA
It is well documented that the homeless suffer from disproportionate high rates of health issues that have an impact on broader society. On average, their life expectancy is almost 15 years less than the life span for the general population. Understanding the incidence of homelessness is imperative in the development and implementation of public health interventions as well as the more equitable and effective distribution of resources. Beginning in 2004, the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) required that regional or local planning bodies, referred to as Continuums of Care (CoC), receiving funds intended for homeless services and programs conduct point-in-time counts of sheltered and unsheltered homeless individuals, children and families every other year. Our study assesses the relationship between homeless estimates and enumeration methods as they are employed across the United States by conducting an in-depth retrospective analysis of public data from HUD and CoCs. We explore nationwide patterns in estimate variation among and within the local CoCs. Our preliminary analysis of nationwide homeless estimates reveals an inexplicably wide range of within-CoC unsheltered homeless estimates, from a minimum of 0% to a maximum of 71,641% from 2007-2013. Our preliminary work also suggests that CoCs are frequently changing the geographic areas sampled, the methods of inferring from sampled data to total estimates, the number of volunteers dedicated to enumeration, and the contracting agencies in charge of enumeration. All of these inconsistent estimate methods lead to variable homeless counts. A better understanding of homelessness enumeration can promote better design and implementation of public health programs and more equitable and effective resource distribution.

Learning Areas:

Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
Describe current local homeless estimates nationwide Discuss variation in point-in-time methodology design and implementation Assess the relationship between homeless estimates and enumeration methods as they are employed across the United States Analyze the impact that inconsistent homeless counts may have in the design and implementation of public health programs, services as well as resource allocation

Keyword(s): Homelessness, Evaluation

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have conducted program evaluations with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at the New York State Department of Health Refugee Health & Tuberculosis Control Programs. I am currently conducting research focused in methodology and best practices utilized to count the homeless nationwide. I received a B.A. in Public Health Studies from Johns Hopkins University and currently attend UC Irvine, School of Medicine, Program in Medical Education for the Latino Community (PRIME-LC).
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.