331012
Implementation of a church-based model for cardiovascular disease risk reduction in rural, southernmost Illinois
Methods: The “Heart Smart” intervention, offered in partner churches over 27 months, includes a 12-week evidence-based program (Heart Smart for Women) followed by a two-year monthly booster program (Heart Smart Maintenance). The booster program, facilitated by a church liaison, is open to all community members, regardless of participation in the 12-week program, and it is tailored to community needs and interests. The Heart Smart evaluation includes collection of demographic and behavioral data, as well as clinical data from participants of the 12-week program.
Results: Across 12 churches, 206 participants enrolled in the evaluation. At baseline, a substantial proportion of participants had risk factors for cardiovascular disease, including hypertension, high cholesterol, and type II diabetes. Most failed to meet recommended vegetable intake and physical activity guidelines. Among participants with clinical measures, one third were considered overweight and over half were considered obese or extremely obese.
Conclusion: Heart Smart is an acceptable model for health promotion that has successfully reached community members at risk for disease in a low-resource community. Heart Smart promotes health equity by tailoring activities to community needs. Building on community strengths and collaborations may contribute to a sustained health focus within rural churches.
Learning Areas:
Administer health education strategies, interventions and programsChronic disease management and prevention
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Public health or related research
Learning Objectives:
Describe a model for promoting short-term and long-term improvements in cardiovascular disease risk factors in a rural, low-resource setting
Discuss a method for translating and transforming an evidence-based program from a clinical to a community setting
Explain the benefits of collaborative partnerships for implementation of a community-based intervention
Keyword(s): Community-Based Partnership & Collaboration, Prevention
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been involved in the implementation and evaluation of women's health programs for over 12 years, with a particular focus on chronic disease prevention and rural women's health.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.