Online Program

334916
How well are we doing? Seven years of wellness policy progress nationwide


Tuesday, November 3, 2015 : 5:30 p.m. - 5:45 p.m.

Jamie F. Chriqui, PhD, MHS, Institute for Health Research and Policy and Division of Health Policy & Administration, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Elizabeth Piekarz, JD, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Margaret Pickel, MPH, Institute for Health Research & Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chcago, IL
Rebecca Schermbeck, MPH, MS, RD, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Yuka Asada, PhD RD, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Genesis Rosales, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Julien Leider, MA, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Frank J. Chaloupka, PhD, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Background: Federal law requires school districts participating in federal child nutrition programs to adopt/implement a wellness policy (WP) as of school year (SY) 2006-07. This presentation examines the progress and factors associated with WP comprehensiveness and strength between SY 2006-07 and 2012-13.

Methods: On-the-books WP (and all associated regulations/embedded policies) were compiled for 1980 districts as part of the largest, annual cross-sectional nationwide WP evaluation. Policies were evaluated using an adaptation of WellSAT for: overall comprehensiveness-OC and strength-OS for 100+ items and separately for nutrition education-NE, school meals-SM, competitive foods-CF, physical education-PE, physical activity-PA, staff wellness-ST, communications-CM, marketing-MP, and evaluation-E. Possible scores ranged from 0-100. T-tests examined temporal trends; multivariate linear regressions examined characteristics (free/reduced-price lunch-FRL, region, locale, size) associated with changes.

Results: Comprehensiveness improved over time (p<.01): OC (32 to 45), NE (42 to 58), SM (32 to 45), CF (36 to 49), PE (25 to 38), PA (34 to 47), ST (19 to 30), CM (32 to 42), MP (17 to 24), and E (31 to 47). Most strength scores also improved but were lower (p<.01): OS (18 to 26), NE (29 to 37), SM (18 to 23), CF (10 to 16), PE (17 to 25), PA (22 to 30), and E (22 to 33). Factors associated with improvements included medium-large size, West region, and higher FRL.

Discussion: Significant progress has been made in wellness policy comprehensiveness and strength over time but improvements are limited to certain regions, SES, or locales and certain foci. More work is needed to ensure widespread progress nationwide.

Learning Areas:

Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
Describe progress and opportunities in wellness policy comprehensiveness and strength nationwide between SY 06-07 and 12-13. Identify factors associated with wellness policy comprehensiveness and strength nationwide.

Keyword(s): Wellness, Public Policy

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been the lead research on this study for over 8 years, am concerned a nationwide expert on wellness policies, and conceptualized and conducted the analyses for this presentation.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.