Online Program

338684
Impact of State Ignition Interlock Laws on Alcohol-Involved Crash Deaths


Tuesday, November 3, 2015 : 9:30 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.

Elinore J. Kaufman, MD, Penn Injury Science Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Douglas J. Wiebe, PhD, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Background: Despite a range of drunk driving prevention policies and programs, alcohol-impaired drivers are still involved in 1/3 of fatal crashes, killing 11,000 people annually. Ignition interlock devices require a driver to pass a breath alcohol test before starting the car. Interlocks reduce recidivist drunk driving arrests, but their impact on crash deaths is not known. Since 2004, 18 states have mandated interlocks for all drunk driving convictions. We investigated the impact of this universal interlock requirement (UIR) on deaths from crashes involving an alcohol-impaired driver.

Methods: Using publicly available data from the CDC and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Fatality Analysis Reporting System, we performed a state fixed effects difference-in-differences analysis of the UIR on alcohol-impaired crash deaths (AICD). We used generalized linear mixed models to account for clustering within states. We included relevant time-varying state characteristics as covariates.

Results: Policy impact was apparent 3 years after implementation. After controlling for year, state fixed effects, state vehicle miles travelled, and additional motor vehicle safety policy changes, adjusted AICD was 6.1 (6.1-6.2) per 100,000 in non-UIR states and 5.1 (4.7-5.5) in UIR states; absolute difference 1.0 (0.6-1.4) per 100,000, p<0.001. This corresponds to approximately 1140 lives saved in UIR states over the study period. There was no significant effect on crash deaths not involving alcohol.

Conclusions: Requiring ignition interlock devices for all drunk drivers led to a decreased rate of drunk driving crash deaths, above and beyond less stringent interlock laws and other drunk driving prevention policies.

Learning Areas:

Public health or related public policy

Learning Objectives:
Evaluate the impact of state ignition interlock laws on state death rates from alcohol-involved crashes.

Keyword(s): Alcohol Use, Policy/Policy Development

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am a physician completing my residency in general surgery, planning to focus on trauma surgery. I am currently a candidate for a Master of Science in Health Policy at the University of Pennsylvania, where my coursework focuses on health services research, and my research focuses on injury prevention and trauma care systems.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.