Abstract

Pilot testing “Take Charge, Get Cured” with methadone patients: A mHealth tool addressing HCV treatment initiation

Amy Jessop, PhD, MPH1, Sarah Bass, Ph.D., MPH2, Jesse Brajuha, MPH3, Mohammed Alhajji, PhD, MPH2, Monika Burke, RN, MPH4, Muhamed Gashat, MD, MPH5, Paul D'Avanzo, MS6, Carine Wellington7 and Nicole Ventriglia8
(1)Western Michigan University, Grand Rapids, MI, (2)Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, (3)Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, (4)HepTREC, Ardmore, PA, (5)HepTREC at University of the Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, (6)Temple University College of Public Health, Phialdelphia, PA, (7)George Washington University, Washington, DC, (8)Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

APHA's 2019 Annual Meeting and Expo (Nov. 2 - Nov. 6)

Background: Approximately 75% of U.S. methadone patients have chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infections yet few initiate treatment. We developed “Take Charge, Get Cured”, a mHealth treatment decision tool tailored to concerns of methadone patients using innovative commercial marketing techniques called perceptual mapping and vector modeling. The tool includes easy to understand educational information using animation and voice-over, video with real patients, a selection of questions to ask doctors, and a pros/cons list they can use to aid in treatment decisions.

Methods: We conducted a pilot randomized control trial at four Philadelphia methadone treatment centers to test feasibility of our tool and compare its impact on perceptions and knowledge about HCV and HCV treatment, decisional conflict, self-efficacy, and intention to initiate HCV care to a non-tailored HCV decision aid. Subjects (n=122) were administered baseline questionnaires, interacted with one of the two decision aids on a tablet and answered post questions. At 3 month follow-up, subjects (n=93; 76%) were re-administered the questionnaires, discussed the decision aids, and noted actions taken to initiate HCV care.

Results: Testing indicated that “Take Charge, Get Cured” users were more likely to report the tool helped with decision making and had greater improvement in knowledge, decisional conflict, self-efficacy, and intention to be treated. No difference in treatment initiation was noted.

Conclusions: A highly targeted decision tool is an acceptable and feasible intervention to increase HCV treatment knowledge, decrease decisional conflict, and affect intentions. Future interventions will need to address potential structural issues that affect treatment follow-through.

Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs Public health or related research