Abstract

Reducing indoor use of combustible tobacco, nicotine, and cannabis products in multi-unit subsidized housing

Maya Vijayaraghavan, MD1, Marlena Hartman-filson1, Toshali Katyal1, Tram Nguyen, TNN2, Priyanka Vyas, PhD1 and Margaret Handley, PhD, MPH3
(1)UCSF, San Francisco, CA, (2)Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, (3)University of California San Francisco, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Francisco, CA

APHA's 2020 VIRTUAL Annual Meeting and Expo (Oct. 24 - 28)

Introduction. Comprehensive smoke-free policies are effective in reducing secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure, but they do not protect residents in multi-unit housing. Recent cannabis legalization in California has increased exposure to secondhand cannabis smoke in multi-unit housing. We applied the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior (COM-B) model, a theory-informed set of strategies for understanding barriers to and enablers of behaviors associated with indoor smoke exposure in San Francisco’s Section 8 federally subsidized housing.

Methods. In partnership with the San Francisco Housing Authority we conducted focus groups (n=17 focus groups) with residents and in-depth, semi-structured interviews with housing staff representing 16 out of 30 housing sites. We analyzed transcripts using the COM-B model.

Results. Of the 134 residents, 50% were black or Latinx and 29% smoked currently. Among smokers, 27% concurrently used cannabis in the past 30 days. Of the 27 staff, 66.7% were black or Latinx and 18% smoked currently. Residents did not experience barriers to smoking outside their home (physical Capability), but experienced benefits from smoking such as stress relief, that affected their ability to self-regulate (psychological Capability). Staff lacked the psychological Capability to discuss the impacts of SHS on residents’ health. Physical and social Opportunity, including a lack of a safe space to smoke outdoors and the normalization of indoor cannabis use supported residents’ preference for indoor smoking. Minimizing exposure to all forms of SHS among pets and children was a Motivation for residents to not smoke indoors. Staff reported lacking Motivation to enforce an indoor no-smoking rule because a strong belief that eviction should not be a repercussion of policy violation.

Conclusion. Interventions to promote smoke-free living in multi-unit housing should target all combustible tobacco, nicotine and cannabis products, and include ways to address motivations so that residents voluntarily adopt smoke-free homes.

Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines Public health or related public policy Social and behavioral sciences Systems thinking models (conceptual and theoretical models), applications related to public health