Abstract

Seattle flu study “swab and send”: At-home surveillance methods to estimate the burden of respiratory pathogens on a city-wide scale

Ashley E. Kim, BS1, Elisabeth Brandstetter, MPH1, Chelsey Graham, MEng2, Jessica Heimonen, MPH1, Audrey Osterbind, BA1, Peter D. Han, MS2, Lea M. Starita, PhD2, Margaret M. Van de Loo, BA3, Jen Mooney3, Mark J. Rieder, PhD2, Misja Ilcisin, BSc4, Kairsten A. Fay, BSc4, Jover Lee, BSc4, Thomas R. Sibley, BA4, Trevor Bedford, PhD4 and Helen Chu, MD MPH1
(1)University of Washington, Seattle, WA, (2)Brotman Baty Institute, Seattle, WA, (3)Formative, Seattle, WA, (4)Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA

APHA's 2020 VIRTUAL Annual Meeting and Expo (Oct. 24 - 28)

Context Understanding the community-based burden of respiratory pathogens is essential during pandemics and epidemics.

Methods We conducted a novel, city-wide home-based cross-sectional study in the Seattle Metropolitan area, utilizing rapid delivery systems for self-collection of a nasal swab and return to the laboratory for respiratory pathogen testing. All participation took place electronically, including recruitment, consent, and data collection. Within 24 hours of participants self-reporting respiratory symptoms, a nasal swab kit was delivered via a courier service. Demographic and illness characteristics were reported at the time of sample collection; one week later, recovery and behavioral information were collected.

Results From October 11, 2019 to January 25, 2020, 1,440 individuals enrolled and received a swab kit; 1,176 (85%) completed the illness questionnaire and returned their nasal swab, and 1,092 (93%) completed the follow-up survey. Among the 1,176 participants, 24% tested positive for influenza, and 41% tested positive for any respiratory pathogen. 746 of 1,092 participants (68%, p<0.0001) had not sought clinical care at follow-up. After adjusting for redeliveries, the average delivery time to Seattle participants was 2.5 hours (N=1,124), with 69% of those meeting the 2-hour delivery target.

Conclusion The majority of participants completed all study procedures, and a high proportion tested positive for a respiratory pathogen. A significant proportion of participants were non-healthcare-seeking, representing the subset not captured by traditional surveillance networks. In epidemic settings, home-based surveillance is a feasible and important method for community-level respiratory pathogen monitoring.

Epidemiology Protection of the public in relation to communicable diseases including prevention or control Public health or related research