Abstract
Pregnancy intendedness by extent of disability among people who had recently given birth, 2019 – 2020
APHA 2023 Annual Meeting and Expo
Methods: We analyzed 2019-2020 PRAMS data from 23 sites that included the Washington Group Short Set of Questions on Disability (n=37,832). We examined associations of extent of disability (none [reference group], some difficulty, or a lot of difficulty) with pregnancy intendedness (classified as intended [reference group], mistimed, unwanted, or unsure) using multinomial logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) while controlling for sociodemographic characteristics.
Results: Overall, 60.1% of pregnancies were intended, 18.2% mistimed, 6.4% unwanted, and 15.3% unsure. Compared to respondents with no difficulty, respondents with some difficulty and a lot of difficulty were more likely to report a mistimed pregnancy (aOR=1.55, 95%CI 1.40,1.71; aOR=1.62, 95%CI 1.34,1.95), an unwanted pregnancy (aOR=1.92, 95%CI 1.66,2.24; aOR=2.20; 95%CI 1.72,2.82), and unsure intendedness (aOR=1.61, 95%CI 1.45,1.79; aOR=1.75, 95%CI 1.45,2.11), respectively.
Conclusions: Disabled women are more likely to report an unintended pregnancy, regardless of extent of disability. A better understanding of pregnancy intendedness in relation to disability will inform targeted intervention efforts to support healthy pregnancies and positive outcomes.
Epidemiology Public health or related research