Abstract

A price too high: Injury and assault among delivery gig workers in New York City

Sherry Baron1, Zoey Laskaris, PhD2, Jim Stimpson, PhD3, Emilia Vignola, PhD4, Zachary Shahn, PhD5, Nevin Cohen, PhD, MCRP6 and Mustafa Hussein, PhD7
(1)Brooklyn, NY, (2)Queens College, City University of New York, Queens, NY, (3)Dallas, TX, (4)Seattle, WA, (5)New York City, NY, (6)CUNY Urban Food Policy Institute, New York, NY, (7)CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY

APHA 2024 Annual Meeting and Expo

Objective: The number of workers employed by digital platforms continues to grow. Preliminary research suggests dependence on such work, as a main job versus side ‘gig,’ strongly influences the material and psychosocial job stressors workers experience. We explored the role of dependence on injury and assaults among the 61,000 prepared food delivery workers in NYC.

Methods: Data were collected in a 2022 survey commissioned by the NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protections among all NYC platform-based prepared food delivery workers. Modified Poisson regression models were used to estimate the adjusted prevalence rate ratio associations between job dependence and injury and assault.

Results: Among the 1,650 food delivery gig workers included in our analytic sample, 67% reported that delivery gig work was their main or only job (fully dependent). While working for a platform-based delivery company, 21.9% reported experiencing an injury resulting in missed work, loss of consciousness, or receiving medical care and 20.8% reported being assaulted. Fully dependent respondents had a 1.61 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20, 2.16) and a 1.36 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.80) times greater prevalence of injury and assault, respectively, than partially dependent respondents after adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, language, employment length, transportation mode, and weekly work hours.

Conclusion: Dependence represents an axis of health inequality given how closely it tracks with social position. Lower-educated, minoritized, and immigrant workers with fewer standard employment prospects are more likely to be fully dependent on gig work and are more likely to experience its negative effects than to accrue its flexibility benefits. Dependence is tied to loss of control over work schedules and the ability to decline more dangerous assignments. Labor policy which classifies most gig workers as independent contractors is perpetuated by false narratives of the benefits of flexibility, especially for those fully dependent on these jobs.

Epidemiology Occupational health and safety Public health or related research