Abstract
An implementation science study of incorporating eye care in rural primary care settings for patients with diabetes mellitus: a mixed methods approach
APHA 2025 Annual Meeting and Expo
Methods: Quantitative analysis involved 885 diabetic patients seen in two rural clinics who were characterized into four groups: patients participating in pop-up clinic dilated eye exams (n=52), teleophthalmology (n=39), in-person dilated eye exams at the eye doctor (n=586), and no recent eye exam (n=208). Qualitative analysis included five patient interviews from each of the four groups (n=20), and 14 staff interviews from primary care and ophthalmology.
Results: Of the four groups, patients in the teleophthalmology and pop-up eye clinic groups had the highest rates of unmet transportation needs (7.4%), housing instability (14.3%) and food insecurity (15%). More eye pathology including diabetic retinopathy (21% versus 7.7%) and vision problems (48% versus 22%) were detected in the pop-up eye clinic than in teleophthalmology but teleophthalmology was seen as quicker and more convenient. The main barrier to teleophthalmology was staff training while scheduling barriers led to underutilization of the pop-up eye clinic.
Conclusion: Complementing teleophthalmology screening with pop-up eye clinic comprehensive eye exam for those who screen positive for an eye disease may improve access to care for screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Chronic disease management and prevention Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs