While underfunding and invisibility are chronic problems in public health, the current historical moment poses a different level of threat to the ideas, programs, and workforce of public health. Beyond the attacks on public health directly, we are also seeing the disparagement and dismantling of federal support for social services, education, diversity, and even basic research. What should public health nurses do in times like these? What are we doing?
We invite research abstracts that examine these questions in thoughtful and innovative ways. We are particularly interested in research that evaluates public health nursing practice in any of the following domains:
PHNs as Witnesses and Partners: Nurses are embedded in communities and are likely to be among the first to see the effects of these policy changes. Whether in the form of data or stories, can we bring the news of suffering and resistance to the wider world? Can we develop new ways to collaborate with communities impacted by these changes to promote health and social justice?
PHNs as Policy Advocates and Organizers: How are PHNs involved in community organizing and policy-level advocacy? This is historically complicated for many in public health, since as public employees there may be restrictions on what we can do. However, we cannot remain silent in times like these. How then do we speak and act?
PHNs as researchers: Research funding at the federal level is being dramatically reduced, and the new priorities and mechanisms are unknown. What are researchers at various levels doing to cope with this uncertainty? Are there ways of doing research that don’t require such heavy investments from NIH? Are there alternative models of science that are a better fit for this new and frankly politicized environment?
We encourage abstracts that will promote lively and engaged conversations on these important questions.
Stephen M. Padgett, RN, PhD (research chair)
Assistant Professor, School of Nursing
California State University, Fullerton
Abstract Format
Limit abstracts to 250 words, using one of three formats (unstructured abstracts are not accepted):
Research:
Lessons-learned:
Narrative:
Review Criteria
All abstracts will be blind-reviewed by 2-3 reviewers using the following criteria:
Continuing Education Credit
APHA values the ability to provide continuing education credit to physicians, nurses, health educators, veterinarians, and those certified in public health at its annual meeting. Please complete all required information when submitting an abstract so members can claim credit for attending your session. These credits are necessary for members to keep their licenses and credentials.
For a session to be eligible for Continuing Education Credit, each presenter must provide:
Contact Mighty Fine at mighty.fine@apha.org if you have any questions concerning continuing education credit. Please contact the program planner for all other questions.
Pamela Jones, PhD, MPH, RN
prjones1@gmail.com
and
Rebecca Shasanmi Ellis, PhD MPH RN
rs2327@georgetown.edu