6010.0: Thursday, November 16, 2000 - 8:50 AM

Abstract #6187

Cost-effectiveness and cost-efficiency of an urban immunization registry

Verna McKenna1, Alan Sager, PhD2, Julia E. Gunn, RN, MPH1, Pat Tormey, RN, MPH1, Ruchika Bajaj, BS1, and M. Anita Barry, MD, MPH1. (1) Communicable Disease Control, Boston Public Health Commission, 1010 Massachusetts Ave, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, 617-534-5607, Verna_McKenna@bphc.org, (2) Health Services, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA 02118

Background: In 1993, the Boston Immunization Information System (BIIS) was introduced as an electronic registry, tracking, and recall system. BIIS is used in community health centers, hospitals and private practices.

Objectives: Quantify costs of developing and maintaining BIIS in 1998; measure annual cost/child; identify savings accrued from using BIIS; evaluate outcome measures (immunization and overimmmunization rates), explore cost-effectiveness.

Methods: Data on building and using costs collected at 23 BIIS sites, control sites and the health department. Cost and immunization rate data from experimental and control sites obtained for 1993-4 and 1997-8 (pre- and post-BIIS). Data sources: fiscal document reviews, personnel interviews, time and motion information. Projected costs of an expanded hypothetical registry were also calculated.

Results: Total annual cost in 1998 was $345,556 (annual cost/child $5.45). Compared to control sites, cost savings varied by function with greatest savings related to immunization report generation ($167, 394) and tracking ($32,360). BIIS saved $44,048 in 1998 compared to carrying out similar functions without a registry. Immunization coverage levels increased at both BIIS and control sites, with no significant differences in the groups (F=1.47, p=0.23). Overimmunization rates were low for MMR (0.78%) and DTP (1.2%); 15% for OPV. Total annual cost of a hypothetical expanded citywide registry in 1999 was $577,920, with estimated savings of $716,843 compared to a non-registry system.

Conclusions: Immunization registries are an important tool to accomplish critical clinical and public health activities, and can be cost-effective. Novel ways to further decrease building costs, which account for the majoriy of registry cost, should be explored.

Learning Objectives: At the end of the session, participants will be able to: 1) identify the cost of building and using an urban immunization registry, and 2) evaluate the effect of registry expansion on costs and savings

Keywords: Immunizations, Registry

Presenting author's disclosure statement:
Organization/institution whose products or services will be discussed: None
I do not have any significant financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with any organization/institution whose products or services are being discussed in this session.

The 128th Annual Meeting of APHA