5318.0: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 - 9:00 PM

Abstract #8108

Comparison of traditional classroom and distance learning in maternal and child health continuing education

Ndola Prata, MD, MSc1, Bonnie Lee, MPH1, Suellen Miller, CNM, MHA, PhD1, David Barney, MSW, MPH1, Julia Walsh, MD, DTPH1, and Geraldine Oliva, MD, MPH2. (1) School of Public Health, Maternal and Child Health Program, University of California, Berkeley, 1101 Tolman Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, (510)642-5692, ndola@uclink.berkeley.edu, (2) Family Health Outcomes Project, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Courses on quantitative and cost analysis issues were developed to review the efficacy of an online and face-to-face format for MCH professionals. In year one, we offered a two-day face-to-face course (Y1) and a ten-week on-line (Y11) entitled "Using quantitative Data in MCH Planning". In year two, we repeated this ten week course (Y21) and offered another course, "Cost Analysis and Decision Analysis" in a two-day face-to-face workshop (Y2) and a ten week online course (Y22). Pre/post-tests and course evaluations were used to evaluate participants' learning. The completion rate for Y11 was 32%. The completion rate for the Y21 course increased to 41%. The measures that led to this increase in completion will be discussed. Pre/post- test scores show statistically significant differences for most of the questions. There was no statistically significant differences in either post-test number correct, mean Y11 9.57 vs. mean Y1 8.77 (p=.559), nor in change of knowledge scores, mean online 2.71 vs. mean face-to-face 3.31 (p=1.35). We can conclude from this limited sample that there were no differences between the two groups in knowledge or confidence in knowledge gained. Small steps such as increased technical support, introduction packets, and charging for the course enhanced completion rates for online students. Message boards encouraged interaction among participants, which helped improve social interactions with peers. Distance learning is a viable option for those public health professionals with limited means of travel and resources. It creates continuing education opportunities in areas that traditional classroom training may not, otherwise, reach.

Learning Objectives: 1.Recognize the importance of distance learning in MCH continuing education. 2. Evaluate the efficacy of an online and face-to-face format in continuing education. 3. Identify potential ways to increase completion rates for online students. 4. Discuss lessons learned from this experience

Keywords: Distance Learning, Evaluation

Presenting author's disclosure statement:
Organization/institution whose products or services will be discussed: University of California, Berkeley School of Public health Maternal and Child Health Program
I have a significant financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with any organization/institution whose products or services are being discussed in this session.
Relationship: employment

The 128th Annual Meeting of APHA