4188.0: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 - 3:30 PM

Abstract #8621

Infection control among professional tattoo artists

Monica J. Raymond, BS, RN, School of Public Health & School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, 3018 Colfax Ave. S, Minneapolis, MN 55408, 612-822-3271, raym0042@tc.umn.edu and Linda L. Halcón, PhD, MPH, RN, School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, 6-101 Weaver-Densford Hall, 308 Harvard St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455.

Objectives: To describe the infection control knowledge, attitudes, and practices of professional tattooists in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area, and to compare knowledge with practice. Methods: A cross-sectional study of professional tattoo artists was conducted between October 1999 and May 2000 using a self-administered questionnaire to measure tattooists’ knowledge of bloodborne pathogen transmission/control, attitudes toward regulation, and reported infection control practices. Direct observation also measured infection control practices. All professional tattooists in the region (N@70) were recruited with 81% participation. Descriptive data and analyses of factors associated with knowledge and practices, accounting for cluster sampling by tattoo shop, are reported. Results: Preliminary results represent 53 survey and 10 observation participants. 87% reported exclusive use of single-use needles. Of those who reused needles, 40% reported inadequate cleaning prior to sterilization. Knowledge about bloodborne pathogens was associated with number of tattooists in the studio (p=0.0432), and approached significant association with reported practices (p=0.0754). Educational level was positively associated with self-reported practices (p=0.0019). Observation of tattooing suggested deficiencies in handwashing and cleaning of environmental surfaces. No significant differences were noted between regulated and unregulated shops in knowledge (p=0.89) or reported practice (p=0.13). Only 56% reported full hepatitis B immunization and 37% reported history of needlestick exposure. 94% expressed support for health department inspection and 74% advocated mandatory infection control training. Conclusions: Although participants possess basic understanding of bloodborne pathogen transmission, this knowledge may not be fully operationalized in the workplace. Professional tattoo artists appear willing to engage in infection control education and oversight.

Learning Objectives: Learning objectives: 1) Cite strengths and deficiencies in professional tattoo artists’ knowledge and practice of infection control, 2) describe professional tattooists’ attitudes toward government regulation, and 3) recognize implications for public health policy and collaboration

Keywords: Special Issues, Risk Assessment

Presenting author's disclosure statement:
Organization/institution whose products or services will be discussed: None
I do not have any significant financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with any organization/institution whose products or services are being discussed in this session.

The 128th Annual Meeting of APHA