APHA
Back to Annual Meeting Page
 
American Public Health Association
133rd Annual Meeting & Exposition
December 10-14, 2005
Philadelphia, PA
APHA 2005
 
4263.0: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 - Board 2

Abstract #102734

Birth weight and infant growth: ‘Catch-up’ versus ‘slow-down’ growth

Xu Xiong, MD, DrPH1, Joan Wightkin, DrPH2, Jeanette H. Magnus, MD, PhD3, Gabriella Pridjian, MD4, Juan Manuel Acuna, MD5, and Pierre Buekens, MD, PhD1. (1) Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2022, New Orleans, LA 70112, 504-988-1379, xxiong@tulane.edu, (2) Louisiana Office of Public Health, Maternal and Child Health Program, 325 Loyola Ave, Rm 612, New Orleans, LA 70112, (3) Community Health Sciences, Tulane University School of Public Health, 1501 Canal Street, SL 29, New Orleans, LA 70112, (4) Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70112, (5) CDC Assignee to The Louisiana Office of Public Health, 325 Loyola Avenue, Suite 611, New Orleans, LA 70112

To examine the relationship between fetal growth and infant growth at about 12 months, we conducted a retrospective cohort study based on 3,302 births followed up between 8-18 months from Louisiana Women, Infant and Children Supplemental Food Program, 1999-2001. Infant growth was measured as infant weight gain percent (IWG %) defined as the weight gain from birth to infant weight divided by the birth weight. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare the infant growth measures according to birth weight category and small-, large- or appropriate for-gestational age (i.e., SGA, LGA, AGA) status. There was a reverse relationship between birth weight category and IWG%. The IWG % of birth weight categories of <1500 g, 1500 g-, 2000 g-, 2500 g-, 3000 g -, 3500 g-, and 4000 g- were 613.9%, 393.7%, 306.2%, 238.9%, 205.1%, 177.5%, and 151.3% respectively (p<0.0001). The IWG % of SGA, LGA and AGA were 283.6%, 166.5% and 221.1% respectively (p< 0.0001). The IWG% remained markedly higher in SGA infants and lower in LGA infants at each month of infant age between 8-18 months. However, the low birth weight or SGA infants had lower Z scores and percentiles for weight for age, weight for length. We conclude that low birth weight or SGA infants have a significant ‘catch-up' growth; whereas high birth weight or LGA infants have a significant ‘slow-down' growth. The potential impact of this growth change in SGA and LGA infants in the postnatal period on later life disorders need to be determined.

Learning Objectives:

Keywords: Pregnancy Outcomes, Infant Health

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

I wish to disclose that I have NO financial interests or other relationship with the manufactures of commercial products, suppliers of commercial services or commercial supporters.

Maternal, Infant and Child Health Epidemiology: Poster Session

The 133rd Annual Meeting & Exposition (December 10-14, 2005) of APHA