150939 “You'd think she had AIDS:” Stigmatizing responses to asbestos-related disease as a barrier to health behavior

Tuesday, November 6, 2007: 4:45 PM

Rebecca J. W. Cline, PhD , Communication and Behavioral Oncology Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
Lisa Berry-Bobovski , Communication and Behavioral Oncology Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
Tanis Hernandez, MSW , Center for Asbestos Related Disease, Libby, MT
Brad Black, MD , Center for Asbestos Related Disease, Libby, MT
Ann G. Schwartz, PhD, MPH , Population Sciences, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
John C. Ruckdeschel, MD , Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
Background: Amphibole asbestos exposure in the Libby, Montana area (population, 12,000) constitutes what EPA called the “worst environmental disaster” in U.S. history. More than 270 people have died; hundreds have asbestos-related diseases (ARD); given ARD's lengthy latency period, thousands remain at risk. Stigma, a communication phenomenon involving labeling, manifests itself in altered interpersonal relationships (Goffman, 1963) with potential public health consequences. Purpose: We analyzed stigma and its relationship to health behavior (providing social support, reducing risk, seeking diagnosis/treatment) in a community with widespread exposure to highly toxic asbestiforms. Significance: Previous research addressed rapidly-striking natural disasters' psychosocial consequences and stigmatizing responses to cancer and HIV. Little is known about responses to slow-motion disasters; ARD had not been identified previously as stigmatizing. Methods: Nine focus groups and five interviews (n = 71) were conducted in Libby with people with ARD, family members of people with ARD, and people with no ARD in their families. Results: In a community that otherwise values “taking care of its own,” stigmatizing responses function as a barrier to health behavior. Discussions of “the asbestos problem” were heavily-laced with evidence of ARD-associated stigma, mirroring theory and research findings on stigmatizing diseases, including: negatively characterizing people with ARD; blaming the victim; interpersonal distancing; minimizing ARD's seriousness/magnitude; courtesy stigma (interpersonal and community stigma by association); posing alternative explanations/diagnoses; and self-stigma (e.g., embarrassment, unwillingness to be diagnosed). Conclusion: The Libby experience yields guidance for investigating potential stigmatizing responses to ARD in other communities and developing community-level interventions for other stigmatizing conditions.

Learning Objectives:
At the conclusion of this session the participant will be able to identify and understand: (1) stigma as a communication process with public health consequences, (2) categories and types of communication indicating stigma in general and in this particular context, (3) and public health implications of stigmatizing responses to ARD in Libby and to ARD and other stigmatizing conditions in other communities.

Keywords: Communication Effects, Community-Based Health Promotion

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.