152784
Effect of PM10 and PM2.5 Exposure on Birthweight in North Carolina
Wednesday, November 7, 2007: 3:10 PM
Kerry V. Williams, BS, MEM
,
Children's Environmental Health Initiative, Duke University, Durham, NC
Geeta Swamy, MD
,
Dept. of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Division of Clinical and Epidemiological Research, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Eric C. Tassone, JD, PhD
,
Children's Environmental Health Initiative, Duke University, Durham, NC
Alan Gelfand, PhD
,
Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
Marie Lynn Miranda
,
Children's Environmental Health Initiative, Duke University, Durham, NC
Studies suggest that air pollution exposure may be associated with adverse birth outcomes. We use innovative geospatial methods to link NC Detailed Birth Records for 2000–2003 to USEPA PM 10 and PM 2.5 monitoring data for pregnant women residing within 20km of a monitor. Analysis was restricted to 44,960 (55,246) singleton, non-anomalous, first births without maternal medical conditions or alcohol use for PM 10 (PM 2.5). Multivariate linear modeling was used to estimate birthweight (BWT) as a function of PM exposure, gestation, race, education, marital status, and infant sex. Maternal exposure to PM10 and PM2.5 in the second trimester and during the entire pregnancy was negatively associated with BWT (p<.02 for both). Compared to women living in areas with average PM levels, women living in areas with 10th percentile levels of PM10 (PM2.5) showed an 8 (7) g increase in BWT and those living in areas with 90th percentile levels of PM10 (PM2.5) showed a 9 (8) g decrease in BWT. Tobacco use was associated with 150g lower BWT in both PM models (p<.00001 for both). The combination of residing in areas with 90th percentile PM2.5 levels and tobacco use was associated with an additional 28g decrease in BWT (p<.005). NC has relatively low PM levels. If the NC results are generalizable to areas with much higher PM levels, the effects on BWT would be very significant. The federal standard, intended to provide an “adequate margin of safety,” may need adjustment to account for impacts on pregnant women.
Learning Objectives: 1. Demonstrate innovative geospatial methods for assessing the relationship between air pollution and birthweight.
2. Illustrate the health risk of air pollution exposure on pregnant women.
3. Consider the results for other places with higher levels of air pollution and the corresponding effect on maternal and child health.
Keywords: Maternal Health, Air Pollutants
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Any relevant financial relationships? No Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|