154836
Age-period-cohort analysis of cancer incidence not related to screening or smoking: Estimating potentially avoidable cancer burden
Monday, November 5, 2007: 8:50 AM
Yueh Ying Han
,
Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Joel L. Weissfeld
,
Graduate School of Public Health: Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Devra Lee Davis
,
Center for Environmental Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
Gregg E. Dinse
,
Biostatistics Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC
David M. Umbach
,
Biostatistics Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC
The assessment of time trends in cancer can provide useful indications of future demands for clinical care and also can signal changes in underlying causal factors. Using delay-adjusted incidence data from the SEER 9 registry, we fitted age-period-cohort regression models to estimate site specific trends separately in white and black men and white and black women diagnosed between the ages of 21-84 during the years 1976-2003 for the following groupings of cancers: cancers associated with tobacco smoking, cancers associated with screening technologies, and all cancers outside of these two categories. If one removes cancers related to smoking or screening, increases in the incidence of all other cancers combined have persisted, with average annual changes of 1.12%, 0.98%, 0.80%, and 0.88% for white and black men, white and black women, respectively. These linear secular trends in cancer incidence not related to smoking or screening imply a 22% to 32% increase in risk over 25 years. Simple linear time trends alone do not adequately capture the temporal patterns in cancer incidence not related to screening or smoking. Only black women appear to have strictly linear period effects and all four race-by-gender subgroups exhibit deviations from linearity due to cohort effects. Estimated cohort deviations suggested that incidence rates accelerated from one birth cohort to the next, particularly among women. In conclusion, age-period-cohort models of cancer not related to smoking or screening show increasing secular incidence trends. Environmental exposures may explain these patterns.
Learning Objectives: 1. Identify temporal changes in delay-adjusted cancer incidence associated with age, period, and cohort effects.
2. Distinguish gender- and race-specific incidence trends for cancer not related to smoking or screening.
3. Understand the need for research investigating controllable factors that may account for these patterns.
Keywords: Cancer Prevention, Epidemiology
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Any relevant financial relationships? No Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|