155904 Adoption outcomes for children with mental retardation in the custody of state child protective services systems: Policy and practice implications for long-term well-being

Monday, November 5, 2007: 2:30 PM

Elspeth M. Slayter, PhD, MSW , School of Social Work, Salem State University, Salem, MA
Narda Santos, BSW , Massachusetts Child Welfare Institute, Salem State College School of Social Work, Salem, MA
Since the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, child welfare professionals have increasingly paid attention to disability issues in child protective service, yet little is known about adoptees with mental retardation (MR). This topic is especially important to consider as the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997, which had wide-ranging implications for reducing waiting times between foster care entry and termination of parental rights, created the potential for “hard to place” children to remain in state care for longer with potentially worse longer-term quality-of-life outcomes. Using a cross-sectional design, data from the 2003 national Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System were examined to learn about adoption outcomes for 47,041 children, 2.6% of whom had MR diagnoses (N=1,323). Co-occurring disabilities were more prevalent among children with MR, including visual or hearing impairments (OR=16.8***), physical impairments (OR=16.1***) or diagnoses of emotional disturbance (OR=7.5***). Children with MR experienced longer times between TPR and adoption, with longer waits for children of color with MR (2.1 vs. 1.4 years, t=2.0***). Children with MR were also less likely to be adopted by family members (OR=0.7***) than other children. Children of color with MR were more likely to be adopted by families of color (OR=2.9***). Families adopting children with MR received higher adoption subsidies ($1,517 vs. $1,139, t=2.4***) but were less likely to receive means-tested Title IV-E funds (OR=0.76***). Implications for inter-agency collaboration in support of pre and post-adoption support services for the promotion of longer-term stability and well-being are discussed.

Learning Objectives:
To recognize the prevalence of mental retardation and co-occurring disabilities among adoptive children in child protective services systems To discuss the challenges faced by families of adoptive children with mental retardation vis-a-vis inter-agency practice implications

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.

See more of: Disability and Policy 1
See more of: Disability