159185 Measuring what navigators do for patients: Development of an instrument to assess tasks and use of social networks

Monday, November 5, 2007: 2:50 PM

Victoria Parker, DBA , Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA
Jack Clark, PhD , Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA
Tracy Battaglia, MD, MPH , Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
Elizabeth Calhoun, PhD , School of Public Health, Division of Health Policy and Administration, University of Illinois, Chicago, Chicago, IL
Ronald Epstein, MD , Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
Karen Freund, MD, MPH , Director, BU Center of Excellence in Women's Health, Chief, Women's Health Unit, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
Problem:

Patient navigation—the process of linking patients to complex cancer services, circumventing barriers, organizing services, and tracking patients through treatment—holds promise for reducing disparities in cancer outcomes. Navigation programs have proliferated, but the parameters of navigators' roles are not well defined, limiting understanding of how their performances vary and how specific components contribute to optimal patient outcomes. We developed an instrument for measuring navigators' work.

Methods:

Navigators in the nine participating sites of the NCI-funded Patient Navigator Research Program (PNRP) support the care of patients with abnormal screening tests for breast, cervical, colorectal, or prostate cancer. We chose three representative sites for close, qualitative study, shadowing and interviewing navigators as they worked. Detailed field notes were aggregated and compared across all navigators, sites, and cancers to develop a taxonomy of navigator activities.

Results:

The taxonomy defines two dimensions: tasks and network contacts. Tasks include scheduling tests and appointments, speaking to physicians to support care, identifying community supports, and arranging for services. Network contacts include the parties involved in accomplishing and supporting care, such as patients, providers, administrative staff, and social service agencies. The taxonomy informed a structured, comprehensive instrument for observing the work of navigators.

Conclusions:

We have developed an instrument to be applied in the remaining PNRP sites and Avon Foundation-supported programs that serve women with breast cancer. It should prove to be sensitive to the diverse settings in which navigators work and enable systematic description of variation in what navigators do for use in outcomes studies.

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe how patient navigators might improve timely treatment and care for cancer patients. 2. Identify a taxonomy of navigator actions and network connections that constitute their work. 3. Discuss how measures of navigators’ activities may be used to characterize the processes patient navigation programs.

Keywords: Access to Care, Research

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.