163016 Colon Cancer in Pennsylvania: Predictors of County-Level Incidence and Geographic Clustering

Monday, November 5, 2007: 9:20 AM

Robin Taylor Wilson, MA, PhD , Epidemiology Division, Health Evaluation Sciences, Penn State University, Hershey, PA
Yihai Liu, PhD , Epidemiology/Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Erik Lehman, MS , Epidemiology Division, Health Evaluation Sciences, Penn State University, Hershey, PA
Eugene J. Lengerich, VMD, MS , Epidemiology Division, Public Health Sciences, Penn State University, Hershey, PA
Background: The incidence of colon cancer in Pennsylvania is higher than the US. County-level analysis and mapping of cancer clusters may help prioritize cancer control. Purpose: 1) Determine whether geographic clustering of colon cancer incidence occurs and whether cluster patterns differ by stage and site (left- versus right-sided); and 2) Identify county-level characteristics associated with incidence. Methods: Cases diagnosed between 1994-2002 were identified through the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry. Principal components analysis was used to create a county-level SES index based on the 2000 Census. County-level colon cancer screening and obesity prevalence were derived from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. SaTScan was used to determine geographic clustering by county. Poisson regression estimated incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) according to the county-distribution of age, sex, race, SES index, obesity, screening, and rural residence as defined by the Beale rural-urban continuum. Results: We identified 54,617 colon cancer cases. Lower SES was associated with higher left-sided colon cancer incidence (IRR=1.11, 95% CI: 1.03-1.19, p-trend=0.003), adjusting for age, sex, race, screening and obesity. Clustering of late stage cancer persisted in two metro regions, including a three-county area in the north east (Beale=2) and two southeastern counties (Beale=1). Adjustment for SES revealed a cluster of late stage cancer incidence in rural non-metro counties in the western portion of the state. Conclusion: Geographic clustering of late stage colon cancer occurs. The association between left-sided colon cancer and low SES is worthy of further investigation.

Learning Objectives:
Attendees will learn 1) sources of cancer and cancer screening surveillance information; 2) application of a major cancer cluster detection software package; 3) methods of county-level analyses using cancer incidence statistics; and 4)the development of an SES index using 2000 census data

Keywords: Data/Surveillance, Cancer

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Any relevant financial relationships? No
Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.

See more of: Cancer Epidemiology Session 1
See more of: Epidemiology