163222
Assessing Changes in US Government Funding for International Health
Monday, November 5, 2007: 11:10 AM
We integrated publicly available fiscal and budgetary data to assess historical and prospective U.S. international health funding commitments in relation to relevant benchmarks. The results suggest that adjusted historical growth rates for critical funding priorities like child survival, maternal and child health and women's reproductive health and family planning significantly under-perform relevant benchmarks. The prospective outlook for U.S. international health funding at all levels is challenging. Competition for scarce discretionary resources, competing policy priorities, and protracted fiscal pressures will make it difficult for U.S. international health contributions to fully meet the significant expenditure requirements needed to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. Moreover, changes in relative funding composition raise difficult questions that may require further study among donor community members.
Learning Objectives: Identify and assess changes in historical and prospective U.S. government investments in international health funding objects.
Identify and assess changes in the relative composition of U.S. investments in international health funding objects (e.g. PEPFAR funding objects in relation to other core, international health funding objects).
Identify and assess policy and practical implications of U.S. international health funding levels and changes in relative composition.
Keywords: International Health, Funding
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Any relevant financial relationships? No Any institutionally-contracted trials related to this submission?
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|