176337 Bringing Men Back: Does Provider Specialty Matter?

Tuesday, October 28, 2008: 2:50 PM

Daria P. Rostovtseva, MS , Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, Sacramento, CA
Heike Thiel de Bocanegra, PhD, MPH , Bixby Center for Reproductive Health Research & Policy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Carrie Lewis, MPH , California Department of Health Services Office of Family Planning, UCSF/CA Department of Health Services, MCAH/OFP, Sacramento, CA
Mary Menz, RN, PHN , Bixby Center for Reproductive Health Research & Policy, University of California, San Francisco, Sacramento, CA
Phillip Darney, MD, MSc , Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Healthy People 2010 Objective 9-6 aims to increase male involvement in pregnancy prevention and family planning efforts. However, retaining men in family planning programs continues to present challenges. California's family planning program, Family PACT, provides family planning services to low-income men through a diverse provider network that includes a variety of specialties, including primary care-oriented specialties (PC), such as Family Practice and Internal Medicine, as well as traditional women's health and family planning-focused sites (FP). To identify factors affecting men's retention, we examined data from a medical record review of services provided in 2005 to 254 men for whom the data captured their first visit with the provider. Sixty-two (62) men went to an FP site and 192 to a PC site. Of the 254 men, 45% did not return to their provider within 14 months. Controlling for race and age, men who returned to their provider were more likely to have visited a PC provider than an FP-oriented provider (OR 1.87, CI 1.03-3.39). Men who returned to PC-oriented sites were more likely to have the sites serve as their source of regular care than men who returned to FP-oriented sites (OR 4.9, CI 1.9-12.6). In conclusion, PC-oriented settings may have a greater potential for retaining men in family planning programs by providing more comprehensive services financed through a variety of funding streams. Provider sites where men's whole health needs are integrated may be a model for increasing male involvement in family planning.

Learning Objectives:
Describe the delivery network for a large public program serving low-income men with family planning services Identify factors that do not influence retention among men for family planning services Discuss the relationship between provider specialty and male client retention in family planning List key policy implications/best practices for designing a delivery network to serve men with continuous family planning services

Keywords: Family Planning, Male Reproductive Health

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: This abstract comprises an original research I conducted as a member of the UCSF Family PACT program support and evaluation team.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.