176433 Assessment of Nonresponse Bias in the Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions for Influenza Telephone Survey

Monday, October 27, 2008: 1:15 PM

Douglas B. Currivan, PhD , Survey Research Division, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
Frank Destefano, MD , Statistics and Epidemiology, RTI International, Atlanta, GA
Rodney Baxter, PhD , Survey Research Division, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
Scott F. Wetterhall, MD, MPH , Health Security and Systems Research, RTI International, Atlanta, GA
The recent decline in telephone survey response rates compels researchers to assess the potential for nonresponse bias in most telephone survey data. One challenge to analyzing nonresponse bias is that limited information about nonrespondents is available for most surveys. Census data can usually provide demographic figures for the target population, but other reliable sources must be used to provide benchmarks on how demographic characteristics may be related to the survey measures of interest. Accepting this challenge, we assess nonresponse bias in a community health survey conducted in four counties in North Carolina. This survey focused primarily on residents' knowledge, attitudes, and practices with respect to the role of non-pharmaceutical steps for preventing the spread of influenza. We use Census data to assess how survey respondents and nonrespondents differ on demographic characteristics. Other sources, including the Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System and National Health Interview Survey, indicate how these demographic differences may be related to key survey measures. The key measures include steps taken to avoid contracting influenza, incidence of an influenza-like illness, and number of daily social interactions. As two examples, higher representation among women versus men likely contributed to an overestimate of the proportion of residents receiving a flu shot; higher representation among residents over age 65 versus younger residents likely contributed to an underestimate of the average number of social interactions. We discuss the potential impact of telephone survey nonresponse on community health surveys and steps researchers can take to both prevent and assess nonresponse bias in surveys.

Learning Objectives:
1) Identify and understand major sources of nonresponse bias in community health surveys conducted by telephone. (2) Apply knowledge of nonresponse bias to the design and analysis of future community health surveys.

Keywords: Survey, Infectious Diseases

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am a Survey Methodologist with over 10 years of professional experience in survey research covering telephone, in-person, mail, Web, and multiple-mode data collection projects for government, not-for-profit, and academic clients. My primary areas of survey expertise and interest are maximizing response rates, evaluating nonresponse bias, interviewer effects on data, cognitive testing of questions, and measuring sensitive behaviors using computerized self-administration methods. am also experienced in performing statistical analysis and writing reports on a range of methodological issues. I have coauthored peer-reviewed journal articles on the use of T-ACASI methods in youth tobacco surveys and the impact of increasing survey nonresponse on adult smoking estimates, and I have given numerous presentations on these and other topics at professional conferences. I also teach a course on Data Collection Methods in Survey Research at the University of North Carolina in conjunction with the Joint Program in Survey Methodology at the University of Maryland.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.