177024 Hearing Protection Use in an Urban Population: Preliminary Data

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Robyn R.M. Gershon, DrPH , Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY
Richard L. Neitzel, MS, CIH, PhD , Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Martin F. Sherman, PhD , Loyola University, Baltimore, MD
Marina Zeltser, BA , Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
Stephanie Samar, BA , Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
Muhammad Akram, PhD , Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
Jaclyn B. Spitzer, PhD , Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY
Purpose: Noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) is the most common health problem in industrial societies. While occupational exposure to excessive noise is the most common risk factor, high rates of noise induced hearing loss continue, even though occupational standards have been in place for decades. Poor compliance with use of personal hearing protection (PHP) has been considered as one of the reasons for the high prevalence and incidence of NIHL, but increasingly, researchers are considering the relative contribution of other sources of excessive noise exposure, such as mass transit ridership and recreational sources of noise. This study was designed to assess risk of exposure from these sources of noise and to determine frequency of PHP use.

Method: A four-page survey was administered to a representative community sample.

Results: A small proportion (13%) of respondents worked in high-noise occupations (e.g., construction, farming, mining); of these, 1/3 reported consistent use of hearing protection at work. With respect to leisure-type activities, 5% reported frequently participating in four or more noisy activities, and only 3% reported frequent use of PHP during these activities. More than 75% of the sample reported subway ridership, with average length of weekday rides 111 minutes; less than 4% reported PHP use.

Conclusions: Low rates of PHP use at work and very low rates for other activities were reported. These sources of noise could result in NIHL, given sufficient exposure. Efforts to increase PHP use will likely have beneficial impacts on the hearing health on urban populations in the US.

Learning Objectives:
1.To list major sources of excessive noise exposure. 2.To describe the methods to assess Personal Hearing Protection (PHP) use in an urban population. 3.To estimate the use of PHP in urban community members.

Keywords: Hearing Protection, Urban Health

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am the Principal Investigator.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.