177976 Risk Communication in Practice: Applying Risk Communication Theory to Multiple Audiences in FEMA Trailer Communication Strategy

Tuesday, October 28, 2008: 2:45 PM

Jana L. Telfer, MA , National Center for Environmental Health/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA
Scott A. Damon, MAIA, CPH , Nceh, CDC, Atlanta, GA
Charles Green, MFA, MA , National Center for Environmental Health/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA
Marianne Hartin, MLS , National Center for Environmental Health and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Sascha Chaney , National Center for Environmental Health/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA
While use of risk communication theory in environmental emergencies is well documented, its use in complex, long-term situations may be less understood. More than 18 months after Hurricane Katrina, concern emerged that trailers the federal government provided might contain unhealthy levels of formaldehyde. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was asked to conduct studies to assist in understanding levels of formaldehyde in trailers and protective actions needed. At the same time, CDC undertook community outreach to share information about indoor air quality as well as any study findings. In the course of this activity, Congress initiated inquiries, news reporting increased, and lawsuits were filed.

Using risk communication theory and models as a foundation, CDC created a multi-functional communication structure. Theory informed practice in recommendations for communication plans, content and types of materials, communication channels. Audiences included trailer residents, health professionals, members of Congress. Audience needs and concerns and educational and resource levels were widely disparate. CDC customized communication to meet specific audience needs in a climate of uncertainty and rapid change, multiple competing interests, and public attention focused on establishing blame.

Dissemination of information is a recognized component of public health practice. In an era of 24-hour, personalized information, the challenge of customizing for multiple audiences can be daunting for public health agencies. Effective application of risk communication theory can inform health communication practitioners and assist in customizing strategies and products to meet audience-specific needs, even when events are emerging and changing.

Learning Objectives:
1. Understand risk communication theories and models applicable to situations with angry or adversarial publics. 2. Understand how to use theory and models in practical application for measurable communication outcomes.

Keywords: Risk Communication, Health Communications

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I was the lead on the project for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, coordinating all aspects of communication related to this engagement. I am Associate Director for Communication Science, National Center for Environmental Health/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. I have more than two decades of experience in the field of risk communication.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.