180515 Reliability of the PEONIES approach to consumer-centered to long-term care quality assurance/quality improvement

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Sarita L. Karon, PhD , Center for Health Systems Research and Analysis, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI
Barbara Bowers, PhD , School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
Kay Hutchison, MS , Center for Health Systems Research and Analysis, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI
Donna Kopp, RN, MS , Center for Health Systems Research and Analysis, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI
Kim Nolet, BS , School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
Brenda Ryther, RN, MS , Center for Health Systems Research and Analysis, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI
The PEONIES approach is a unique method of assessing and measuring the quality of community-based long-term services and supports, based on consumer-specific outcomes in 12 areas. It uses semi-structured interviews to identify specific outcomes of importance to consumers; determine the current status of these outcomes; identify supports and services necessary to support achievement of the desired outcomes; and assess the adequacy and acceptability of the necessary supports/services to the consumer. This detailed, consumer-specific information is used in care planning and to report quality indicators at the systems level.

Inter-rater reliability of this approach was tested during late 2007 and early 2008. Project development staff observed interviews of long-term care consumers (“frail elders,” adults with physical disabilities, and adults with developmental disabilities) conducted by skilled quality reviewers and care managers trained in the PEONIES approach. Training was conducted in a six-hour session, after which each interviewer conducted 1 or 2 interviews. A second, 8-hour training was then conducted to reinforce training in areas where there appeared to be confusion.

Interviewers and observers recorded information independently. Inter-rater reliability was assessed overall as percent agreement. Intraclass correlations were calculated to assess reliability separately for the 12 outcome areas, by type of interviewer, and by type of consumer. Detailed qualitative analysis also was done, to identify specific challenges to reliability.

This session will present findings from the reliability test, with particular emphasis given to the qualitative results and the implications for development and implementation of this type of approach to assessing quality.

Learning Objectives:
1. Understand challenges of reliability testing of a semi-structured interview-based approach to measurement 2. Identify strategies for improving reliability of such an approach 3. Appreciate differences in reliability of a single approach used for differing purposes and with diverse consumers

Keywords: Outcome Measures, Quality of Life

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am the Principal Investigator of the project on which this is reporting.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.