180809 Reliability of Height and Weight Measurements Taken by Physical Education Teachers for a School-based BMI Surveillance System

Tuesday, October 28, 2008: 9:00 AM

Stephanie Shapiro Berkson, MPH , The Institute for Community Health, Cambridge, MA
Janice A. Espinola, MPH , Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
Katherine Corso, MPH , The Institute for Community Health, Cambridge, MA
Howard Cabral, PhD , School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA
Robert McGowan, EdD , Physical Education Department, Cambridge Public School District, Cambridge, MA
Virginia Chomitz, PhD , The Institute for Community Health, Cambridge, MA
Background: School-based body mass index (BMI) surveillance is one approach to address childhood obesity. Cambridge Public Schools (CPS) in Massachusetts has maintained a BMI surveillance system since 2000, using trained physical education (PE) teachers to annually collect height/weight measurements of K-8th grade students.

Purpose: To estimate the reliability of height/weight measurements collected by PE teachers in a controlled and natural setting.

Methods: In the controlled setting, five randomly selected PE teachers measured 15 students' heights/weights in duplicate. In the natural setting, during class, eight PE teachers from four schools measured 105 students' heights/weights once, and a trained researcher measured the same students in duplicate. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were estimated by calculating intra- and inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), mean absolute differences, and mean range of measurement values per student.

Results: Controlled setting intra- and inter-rater height/weight ICCs were ³0.96. PE intra-rater mean absolute differences for height/weight were 0.52” and 0.8 lbs. Mean range of all measurement values were 2.18” and 4.6 lbs. In the natural setting, inter-rater ICCs were ³0.98. The overall mean height/weight absolute differences were 0.22” and 0.7 lbs, and of the eight PE vs. researcher comparisons, differences ranged from 0.10” to 0.35” and 0.1 lbs to 1.9 lbs.

Conclusions: Our ICC results demonstrate non-clinical school staff can collect student height/weight reliably for monitoring obesity and evaluating intervention programs. Equipment problems may have impacted weight measurement variability. Given the variability among the other measurements, attention to standardized rater training and precise equipment are recommended to improve reliability.

Learning Objectives:
1. Demonstrate the reliability of anthropometric measurements collected in a school-based surveillance system. 2. Recognize barriers to measuring heights and weights reliably in public schools. 3. Discuss data quality implications of intra- and inter-rater differences.

Keywords: Surveillance, Obesity

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I oversaw the data collection of this research study.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.