181235
Incontinence and trauma: Sexual violence, female genital cutting and proxy measures of gynecological fistula
Amber Peterman
,
Department of Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Obstetric fistula, characterized by urinary or fecal incontinence has begun to receive attention on the international public health agenda, however less attention has been given to traumatic fistula. Field reports indicate trauma contributes to the burden of incontinence, especially in conflict situations, however evidence is largely anecdotal or facility-based. This paper specifically examines the co-occurrence of incontinence and two potential sources of trauma: sexual violence (SV) and female genital cutting (FGC) using the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys in Malawi, Rwanda, Uganda and Ethiopia. Multivariate selection models are used to control for sampling differences by country. Results indicate that SV is a significant determinant of incontinence in Rwanda and Malawi, however not in Uganda. Simulations predict that elimination of SV would result in from seven to 26 percent reduction of the total burden of incontinence. In contrast, no evidence is found that FGC contributes to incontinence and this finding is robust to types of cutting and alternative samples. Results point to the importance of reinforcing programs which seek to address prevention of SV and for the integration of services to better serve women experiencing both SV and incontinence.
Learning Objectives: 1. Define different classifications of fistulae with particular attention to potential contributions of traumatic sources.
2. Describe the association between two sources of trauma and incontinence in cross-country population-level data in sub-Saharan Africa.
3. Identify possible programmatic interventions to address traumatic fistula in resource poor settings.
Keywords: Sexual Assault, Maternal Morbidity
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have conceptualized, conducted the analysis and written the submitted paper. The data are public use (DHS Data). The study was determined not to include human subjects research by the Chapel Hill UNC Social Science IRB.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|