184254
Changes in the Reportable Disease Surveillance Process in the US Army
John F. Ambrose, MPH, CHES
,
Disease Epidemiology, US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, Aberdeen Proving Ground-Edgewood, MD
Esther Pfau, MPH
,
Disease Epidemiology, US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, Aberdeen Proving Ground-Edgewood, MD
Troy Baker, MD, MPH
,
Preventive Medicine, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD
Rodney Coldren, MD, MPH
,
Disease Epidemiology, US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, Aberdeen Proving Ground-Edgewood, MD
Background: Historically, the US Army has relied on limited passive reporting of diseases, which in turn has restricted the response by public health officials. Most reportable medical conditions have not been investigated for detailed risk factor information. In addition, lab confirmation of reportable conditions has been limited to the judgment of the reporting agency. Methods: Changes in the disease reporting process have been implemented by having preventive medicine departments of regional medical commands investigate all reportable medical conditions and confirm each. Reporting and investigation forms have been created based on CDC guidelines and state health department investigations. In addition, a new reportable medical surveillance database was created that will allow real time surveillance for reportable medical events. Outbreak/cluster responses and data interpretation are now conducted by the Disease Epidemiology Program at US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine. Results: Thirty investigation forms, disease fact sheets, and investigation protocols have been developed for investigation of reportable conditions. Detailed case definitions and lab conformation guidelines have been created for standardization throughout the Army Medical Command. The pilot web-based surveillance system is has shown is be a useful tool for near real-time data collection. Conclusions: Changes in the reportable disease process is a large undertaking that requires agreement from multiple agencies, as well as participation for several key sources. Training for investigative techniques as well as lab confirmation process is critical to the success of the new reportable disease process in the US Army.
Learning Objectives: 1. Describe the steps for infectious disease reporting in the US Army.
2. Describe the response to public health threats by the US Army
3. Analyze the new web-based reportable disease response products
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have a Master degree in Public Health and specialized in Epidemiology. In addition, I have worked on infectious disease surveillance for 4 years and have worked within the US Army for 1.5 years. Thus, I have a specialized knowledge of surveillance within the US Army.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|