184966 Are bicycling and walking infrastructure key to get Americans more active? The Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program: An intervention study in four communities

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Thomas Gotschi, PhD , Director of Research, Rails to Trails Conservancy, Washington, DC
Despite a raging obesity epidemic and years of efforts to encourage Americans to be more active, trends in physical activity have remained stable with only one fourth of all adults achieving recommended levels. Bicycling and walking, the predominant forms of nonmotorized, or active transportation comprise a unique potential to integrate physical activity into daily activities, such as commuting and other short distance travel (50% of all trips in the US are 3 miles or less).

Previous cross-sectional studies linked nonmotorized transportation infrastructure to activity levels; however, longitudinal investigations of comprehensive changes in nonmotorized transportation infrastructure are rare.

The Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program (NTPP), part of the federal highway bill (SAFETEA-LU), authorizes the expenditure of $25 million in each of four recipient communities (Columbia, MO; Marin County, CA; Minneapolis, MN; and Sheboygan County, WI) for infrastructure and programming supporting nonmotorized transportation.

Accomplishments to date include establishing project selection criteria, selecting projects, and completing baseline surveys. Mode share of bicycling and walking trips combined ranged between 7 and 20% across the four communities, amounting to 1-4% of total miles traveled. A fifth community without interventions was included to control for time trends in nonmotorized transportation independent of infrastructure investments. Follow-up surveys will be conducted in 2010 to test the hypothesis that the NTPP substantially affects the prevalence of bicycling and walking in the four pilot communities.

Baseline results, survey methods, challenges of intervention studies, and the role of non-motorized transportation in the larger scheme of public health will be discussed.

Learning Objectives:
1. Recognize the potential of nonmotorized, or active transportation for both fulfilling common daily travel needs and activity requirements. 2. Identify roles of the public health community in collaborating with non-health professionals and community groups on achieving the goal of integrating physical activity into daily life. 3. Discuss the research needs and challenges in making the case of linking active transportation investments to health benefits, and identify potential collaborations between the public health community and other groups.

Keywords: Obesity, Physical Activity

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: PhD in Epidemiology from University of Southern California Director of Research at Rails to Trails Conservancy, which is part of the Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program team
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.