190058 Funding Bioterrorism: A Great Leap Backward for Public Health

Monday, October 27, 2008: 10:30 AM

Joia Mukherjee, MD, MPH , Partners In Health, Boston, MA
In the last 10 years, billions of dollars have been spent on so-called bioterrorism preparedness programs and research, without evidence of need. In the beginning, bioterrorism funding was touted as a way to build up public health infrastructure through “dual use”. The reality has been the opposite. Money for important prevention and treatment programs at every level has been diverted and the “dual use” promise has come up empty. As the cost of the Gulf War overwhelms the economy and government finances (directly through Pentagon spending and indirectly through oil and food prices), health service and research budgets have either stagnated or been cut. Meanwhile the challenges to health for millions in the U.S. and billions of people internationally have been made greater by war, climate change, privatization, and high food, fuel and drug prices. Nonetheless bioterrorism spending has become institutionalized with no justification. Can APHA members challenge these backward priorities?

Learning Objectives:
1)To describe the explosion of spending by the NIH and CDC for bioterrorism programs and research, as well as by state and local health departments 2)To contrast this major growth with cutbacks in spending for traditional public health research and service needs 3)To outline major challenges to public health nationally and internationally and identify what should be the real priorities for health spending

Keywords: Bioterrorism, Public Health

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: Presented in the Past
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.