211777 Prostate cancer screening: Making the best choice

Monday, November 9, 2009: 10:50 AM

Randi M. Williams, MPH , Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, DC
Kathryn L. Taylor, PhD , Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, DC
Caroline Dorfman, BA , Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, DC
Elizabeth Kassan, BA , Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, DC
Sara N. Red, BA , Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, DC
David L. Dawson, BA , Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, DC
William Tuong , Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center - Cancer Control Program, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
Elizabeth R. Parker, BA , Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center - Cancer Control Program, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
Janet Ohene-Frempong, MS , The Clear Language Group, Philadelphia, PA
Kimberly M. Davis, PhD , Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center - Cancer Control Program, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
Alex H. Krist, MD, MPH , Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Family Medicine, Fairfax, VA
Steven Woolf, MD , Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Family Medicine, Fairfax, VA
Mark D. Schwartz, PhD , Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center - Cancer Control Program, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
Cheryl Manning , Designer and Developer of Interactive Technologies, Triad Interactive, Inc., Washington, DC
Catherine Swinson , Designer and Developer of Interactive Technologies, Triad Interactive, Inc., Washington, DC
Screening asymptomatic men for prostate cancer (PCa) continues to be controversial: whether early diagnosis and treatment of PCa results in reduced disease-related mortality has not yet been demonstrated in a randomized trial. The primary question is whether PCa screening results in overdiagnosis, the detection and treatment of disease that would not otherwise increase morbidity or mortality. Ongoing trials are addressing this question, but results will not be available for several years. Thus, easily accessible methods for educating men about screening are needed, as men's level of awareness of the limitations of screening is low. However, prior studies of print and video-based prostate screening decision tools have shown that men's knowledge increases and that decisional conflict decreases following use. This study will provide the first assessment of an interactive website designed to educate men about PCa screening. We are conducting an NCI-and DOD-funded three arm randomized trial (website vs. booklet vs. usual care). Participants (planned N = 1875, current N = 877) are assessed by telephone interviews at baselines, 1 month, and 1 year post-randomization. Here we describe the development process and formative evaluation of the website.

Learning Objectives:
1)Describe how health behavior/ learning theories can be applied to the development of electronic health education materials 2)Explain techniques used to tailor electronic health education materials to specific audiences

Keywords: Cancer, Health Communications

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have several years experience in developing materials.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.