220087 “Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century” and reforming the science of toxic chemicals regulation

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Jeffrey Brown , Regulatory Testing Division, PETA, Los Angeles, CA
In light of recent developments in biotechnology and computational toxicology, there is an unprecedented opportunity to improve risk-based regulatory decision-making by modernizing outmoded US toxic chemical laws that continue to rely on time-consuming, resource-intensive animal-based studies that are of questionable relevance to humans. At the behest of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The National Research Council (NRC) devised a new approach to toxicity testing that recognizes the impact of these scientific developments. The result of this effort, NRC's 2007 publication, “Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and A Strategy,” outlines a transformative paradigm shift in toxicology from an observational to a predictive science. Based largely on non-animal test methods, this shift favors high-throughput assays capable of managing large numbers of chemicals and mixtures at relatively low cost. NRC notes that the observational approach to toxicology does not ensure the most appropriate public health decision-making; it is therefore essential that any new legislation governing the regulation of chemicals not only incorporate available predictive methodology, but also stimulate development of novel toxicity assessment approaches consistent with the NRC strategy. Applying the NRC recommendations, we suggest an intelligent EPA Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) testing strategy that would result in more efficient screening and characterization of the endocrine-disrupting potential of manufactured chemicals while reducing reliance on the use of animals. As regulatory toxicology impacts all populations, some more vulnerable than others, robust risk assessment is a centrally important tool for making public health decisions regarding chemical production and use.

Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Environmental health sciences
Epidemiology
Ethics, professional and legal requirements
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Public health or related public policy

Learning Objectives:
1. Outline the basic principles and major weaknesses of the current chemical testing paradigm of observational toxicology. 2. Describe the advantages of using a biological mechanism-based approach to toxicity as outlined by the NRC recommendations, including the concept of toxicity pathways. 3. Apply a mechanism-based approach to an existing program that is currently based in the previously described current observational toxicology paradigm: the EPA EDSP.

Keywords: Bioethics, Drug Safety

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I work with regulators in the US and internationally to commit to and abide by agreements to replace, reduce, or refine the use of animals in experimentation. This includes research into current best practices and support of the validation process for innovative in vitro techniques.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.