222187 Use of social marketing principles and audience research to guide the response to the 2009 H1N1 vaccination campaign

Monday, November 8, 2010

James Bender, MHS, CHES , Center for Health Communication, AED, Washington, DC
Alan Janssen, MSPH , National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Elyse Levine, PhD , Center for Health Communication, Academy for Educational Development, Washington, DC
Derek Inokuchi, MHS, CHES , Center for Health Communication, AED, Washington, DC
Sondra Dietz , Center for Health Communication, AED, Washington, DC
Allison Bozniak , Center for Health Communication, Academy for Educational Development, Washington, DC
Communicating about the 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine presented unique challenges. These included priority audiences recommended by ACIP which differed substantially from those recommended for the seasonal flu vaccine; a vaccine supply that was out of sync with consumer demand; consumer concerns raised by the rapid development and testing of the vaccine; as well as intense and changing media coverage. Campaign efforts focused on parents of children 6 months to 18 years, young adults 19 to 24 years, and persons with risk conditions including pregnant women. Vaccine safety was a concern among many risk groups; others did not perceive 2009 H1N1 to be a threat and/or were unaccustomed to seeking influenza vaccination. CDC held focus groups in June, September, and October to track changes in consumer knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to influenza prevention. The focus groups were used in conjunction with online surveys to quickly test new communication messages and materials. CDC used media monitoring to track coverage of vaccine and safety issues, including traditional and social media, e.g., blogs. Data from all research methods were analyzed from a risk communication perspective to inform changes in strategies and tactics. Notable changes in attitudes toward vaccination, awareness of ACIP recommendations, and intentions to seek vaccination were documented in the months leading up to the flu season. The interplay between perceived risk of disease and safety of the 2009 H1N1 vaccine led CDC to clearly differentiate communication about the disease (increasing risk perception) from the vaccine (reassuring concerned consumers).

Learning Areas:
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Systems thinking models (conceptual and theoretical models), applications related to public health

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe the difference between the influenza communication environment in October 2009 and January 2010. 2. Explain the three major communication challenges for CDC in the 2009-2010 influenza season.

Keywords: Social Marketing, Immunizations

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am a Public Relations and Marketing Specialist, working as a contractor to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Influenza Vaccination Campaign. I’ve worked on the campaign since 2006 and served in this role during the 2009-10 H1N1 Pandemic. I oversee much of the media and partnership outreach for the campaign.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.