238993 In-Class Breakfast: Impact on Breakfast Skipping and Eating in Multiple locations

Monday, October 31, 2011

Gretchen Van Wye, PhD, MA , Bureau of Chronic Disease Prevention, NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, NY
Hannah Seoh, MPH, MS , Bureau of Tobacco Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, NY
Terry Marx, MD, MPH , East and Central Harlem District Public Health Office, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY
Sarah Timmins DeGregory, MPH , East and Central Harlem District Public Health Office, NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Brooklyn, NY
Cindy Gordon, PhD, MA , East Harlem District Public Health Office, NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY
Lynn D. Silver, MD, MPH , HPDP Administration, NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, NY
INTRODUCTION: In the 2009-2010 school year, 180 schools in NYC's high-need neighborhoods implemented in-class breakfast (ICB). The impact of ICB on breakfast skipping, number of items eaten, and location of morning eating was conducted. METHODS: Third - fifth graders in nine ICB and seven matched "control" (no ICB) schools were surveyed from January - March 2010. Students were asked whether they ate food from: home, bodega/restaurant, school cafeteria, or classroom. By location, students indicated each food eaten from a list of food items. 2,289 students (n=1044 ICB; n=1245 control) participated. RESULTS: ICB was associated with lower levels of breakfast skipping (8.7% of ICB students and 15.0% of control school students ate nothing in the morning) but was also associated with higher levels of eating from 2+ locations (51.1% ICB vs. 30% control). Items eaten per child increased with increasing locations: children eating at one location ate 2.4 items while those who ate at two or more locations ate ~5 items. There was no difference in fruit/vegetable (18.8% vs. 17%) or candy/donuts/chips consumption (29% in both groups). Among ICB classroom eaters, 36.5% of students from schools with longer-term implementation ate only in the classroom vs. 27.9% of those from shorter-term implementation schools. DISCUSSION: ICB reduced breakfast skipping but was associated with increased likelihood of eating from multiple locations. Longer implementation may attenuate this association. Additional research should explore ICB's impact on morning and daily caloric and nutrient consumption, as well as BMI, to understand impact on obesity and nutrition.

Learning Areas:
Chronic disease management and prevention
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Epidemiology
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Public health or related public policy

Learning Objectives:
1) Explain in-class breakfast’s impact on breakfast skipping, eating in multiple locations, and consuming multiple items. 2) Define common sources and types of food consumed among children attending schools in high-need neighborhoods in urban settings. 3) Discuss and compare methods of ascertaining morning child eating patterns.

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to present because I oversaw the evaluation of this program in my capacity as the Director of Research, Evaluation, and Planning at the Harlem District Public Health Office at the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.