240763
Black and white rates of low birth weight, preterm birth, and infant mortality by state and county: A mid-decade evaluation of progress toward Healthy People 2010 objectives and the goal of disparity elimination
Wednesday, November 2, 2011: 12:50 PM
Ashley H. Schempf, PhD
,
Office of Epidemiology, Policy and Evaluation, Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Rockville, MD
Michael R. Kramer, PhD, MMSc
,
Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Reem M. Ghandour, DrPH, MPA
,
Office of Epidemiology, Policy and Evaluation, Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Rockville, MD
Pauline Mendola, PhD
,
Infant, Children, and Women's Health Statistics Branch, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD
Kenneth C. Schoendorf, MD, MPH
,
Infant, Children, and Women's Health Statistics Branch, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD
Background: Characterizing states/counties meeting Healthy People (HP) 2010 targets for perinatal outcomes by mid-decade helps to assess feasibility and identify best practices for optimizing outcomes. Methods: Using 2004-2006 national linked birth/infant death files and Bayesian models that smooth unstable estimates, we evaluated state/county performance relative to HP 2010 targets for low birth weight (LBW, <2500 grams, target 5%), preterm birth (PTB, <37 weeks, target 7.6%), and infant mortality (IM, target 4.5/1000 births) for non-Hispanic Black and White births and assessed progress towards eliminating disparities. Results: For IM among Whites only, Massachusetts significantly surpassed the HP target and 11 other mostly Northeastern and Western states had rates similar to the target. No other targets were achieved by states. Of 2,623 counties with Black births, none met LBW or PTB targets but one (Dane County, WI) had an IM rate that was similar to the target. Of 3,140 counties with White births, ~30 predominantly rural and Western counties had LBW or PTB rates similar to the targets. For IM, 28 counties (mostly Northeast metropolitans) did significantly better and 930 had rates similar to the HP target. In general, the few observations of low disparities (RR<1.25) were due to high white rates. Conclusions: States and counties were more successful in meeting the IM target than for LBW and PTB, and only for Whites. Even where Black IM was lowest, it was 50% higher than for Whites. We plan to further explore these data including an evaluation of PTB subgroups (very and moderate PTB).
Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Epidemiology
Learning Objectives: 1) Identify the states and counties that have met Healthy People 2010 objectives for LBW, PTB, and infant mortality and evaluate the goal of disparity elimination
2) Describe those states and counties with respect to region, degree of urbanization, and economic characteristics
3) Discuss the implications for identifying best practices and the feasibility of objective/goal attainment
4) Explain the multilevel/Bayesian method for providing small area inference
Keywords: Healthy People 2000/2010, Perinatal Health
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to present because I am an experienced and published perinatal epidemiologist with diverse methodological training, employed to conduct scientific research at the Maternal and Child Health Bureau and previously at the National Center for Health Statistics
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|