249161 Effect of community water fluoridation on inequalities in oral health

Monday, October 31, 2011: 9:30 AM

Michael McGrady, BDS, PG Dip , School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Roger Ellwood, BDS, MSc, MDS, PhD , Colgate Palmolive Dental Health Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Anne Maguire, BDS, FDS RCS (Ed), PhD, FHEA , School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
Dianne Tabari, BDS, DDPH (FRCS) , Community Dentistry, Newcastle Primary Care Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom
Michaela Goodwin, BSc, MSc , School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Nicola Boothman, BA (Hons), MPhil , School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Iain Pretty, BDS(Hons), MSc, PhD, MFDSRCS (Ed), MPH, FDS(DPH)RCPS , School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Objectives: To determine dental caries and fluorosis prevalence and severity in fluoridated Newcastle and non-fluoridated Manchester, UK. To determine the effect of community water fluoridation on inequalities in oral health. Methods: Subjects were male and female lifetime residents aged 11-13 years. Permanent teeth were assessed for caries using ICDAS and maxillary central incisors for fluorosis using the TF Index. Results: Data from 1783 subjects were available (910 Newcastle, 873 Manchester). Index of Multiple Deprivation scores were comparable between the populations (Newcastle: mean 35.22, range 2.77-78.85; Manchester: mean 37.04, range 1.84-84.02). The fluoridated population had significantly less caries experience (p<0.001) for white spot lesions (ICDAS code 2) (Prevalence: Newcastle 75%, Manchester: 85%; mean DMFT: Newcastle 2.94, Manchester 4.48) and caries into dentine (ICDAS code 4) (Prevalence: Newcastle 33%, Manchester 46%; mean DMFT: Newcastle 0.65, Manchester 1.07). This difference was reflected across the top 4 quintiles of deprivation, but no significant difference in the least deprived quintile. The Odds Ratio for white spot caries experience in Manchester was 2.11 (95% CI 1.62, 2.68) relative to Newcastle. For caries into dentine in Manchester it was 1.84 (95% CI 1.50, 2.26) relative to Newcastle. The prevalence of fluorosis (TFI>0) in Newcastle was 55% and in Manchester 27%. The Odds Ratio for developing fluorosis in Newcastle was 3.39 (95% CI 2.78, 4.15) relative to Manchester. Conclusions: Water fluoridation is a major contributor to reducing the social class gradient between deprivation and caries experience but may increase risk of dental fluorosis when combined with fluoridated dentifrice.

Learning Areas:
Epidemiology
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
1. Assess the prevalence and severity of caries and fluorosis in fluoridated and non-fluoridated urban populations 2. Evaluate the effect of community water fluoridation on inequalities in oral health.

Keywords: Oral Health, Community-Based Public Health

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I was involved in the implementation of the project, the clinical examiner, and the author of the abstract.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.