259973 Can the Ten Step breastfeeding support practices be supported in settings serving low wealth populations without the goal of BFHI achievement?

Monday, October 29, 2012 : 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM

Emily C. Taylor, MPH, CD(DONA), LCCE , Carolina Global Breastfeeding Institute, Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
Miriam Labbok, MD, MPH, FACPM, IBCLC, FABM , Carolina Global Breastfeeding Institute, Department of Maternal Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Nathan C. Nickel, MPH, PhD , Carolina Global Breastfeeding Institute, Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Brook Colgan, MPH, IBCLC , Carolina Global Breastfeeding Institute, Department of Maternal Child Health School of Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Kathy Parry, LMBT, CEIM, MPH Candidate , Department of Maternal and Child Health, Carolina Global Breastfeeding Institute, Chapel Hill
Background: The achievement of the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding has been shown to be associated with breastfeeding increases in hospital studies seeking Baby-friendly status. This project was unique in that it was undertaken to support the Ten Steps in hospitals that serve low-wealth populations and that did not necessarily intend to seek Baby-friendly status. Methods: Six participating hospitals were systematically assigned to intervention and initial control/later intervention groups. Data were collected from all hospitals at baseline, midterm (after the intervention with the first group), and after intervention with both groups. Data collected included breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding rates, health worker KAP, key informant interview, and two methods to assess achievement of the steps. Findings: Data from the three rounds will be presented. Midterm findings include intervention-attributable improvements both in Steps and in breastfeeding rates: 8 out of the 10 steps had intervention associated improvement (i.e., no positive impact on prenatal education or use of pacifiers). Also, both any breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding showed intervention-attributable increases, 2.1% and10.3%, respectively. Discussion: Attempts were made to remedy deficiencies in the second phase. Hospital-based studies published to date have reported on hospitals that intended to seek Baby-friendly status. This study selected hospitals serving low wealth populations. This demonstrates the impact in a situation previously unstudied. Conclusions: Improvements are possible in these settings, and improvements in quality of services and breastfeeding outcomes are possible with a goal of increasing the number of steps in place.

Learning Areas:
Clinical medicine applied in public health
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Other professions or practice related to public health
Program planning
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
The participant will be able to: 1. Differentiate between the Ten Steps and BFHI 2. Explain the potential impact of the Ten Steps

Keywords: Breastfeeding, Maternal Care

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am PI on this project
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.